The Big Idea
Day to day, more about inflation than growth
Steven Abrahams | May 29, 2026
This material is a Marketing Communication and does not constitute Independent Investment Research.
The correlations between energy, US rates and risk markets have eased since the US and Iran went to war in March but remain higher than before the conflict. Before the war, the market responded more to shifting signs of growth. Now it’s more about inflation, but not as much as you might think.
Paying more attention to oil
The market definitely is paying more attention to oil since the outbreak of war. The implications for rates and risk assets are different, although the magnitude of impact across US assets is modest at best. Rates are filtering oil through its impact on inflation and the Fed while risk assets filter it through corporate earnings and credit. Daily changes in the price of Brent crude and rates along the yield curve tell one part of the story, and daily changes in Brent and risk spreads tell the other.
Oil and rates
The tell for rates is the changing correlation between Brent and rates at different maturities. In the 90 days before war broke out, the correlation between Brent and rates all along the curve basically was zero (Exhibit 1). Although both Brent and rates can reflect changes in growth and inflation, the low correlations suggest influences unique to each market called the tune for almost all daily movement in pricing.
Exhibit 1: Changing correlations between Brent crude and rates

Note: PreWar spans 12/1/2025 to 2/27/2026 while War spans 2/28/2026 to 5/28/2026. Correlations are between daily changes. MBS, IG and HY OAS from Bloomberg market indices.
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets.
In the 90 days since the start of war, however, the correlation has jumped into the 0.30s across maturities, with the biggest jumps coming in the shortest maturities and declining further along the curve. That seems consistent with a market worried about inflation and the Fed’s response, especially in the near term. In other words, when oil goes up and raises concern about inflation and Fed hikes, rates go up and the yield curve flattens.
Caveats apply. The correlations between Brent and rates still top out at 0.36, meaning that only (0.36)2 or 13% of the daily changes in rates can be directly attributed to Brent and 87% of the changes come from something else.
Oil and risk assets
The tell for risk assets is the changing correlation between Brent and spreads, and especially between investment grade and high yield spreads (Exhibit 3). Before war broke out, Brent showed a very small negative correlation with spreads. A rise in Brent tended to come with tightening spreads, and a drop in Brent with widening. Oil and risk spreads tend to move in opposite directions in a market responding to growth, higher growth pushing up the price of oil, raising the prospects of better corporate earnings and tightening credit spreads with lower growth having the opposite effects.
Exhibit 2: Changing correlation between Brent crude and risk spreads

Note: PreWar spans 12/1/2025 to 2/27/2026 while War spans 2/28/2026 to 5/28/2026. Correlations are between daily changes. MBS, IG and HY OAS from Bloomberg market indices.
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets.
Since the outbreak of war, the correlation between Brent and risk spreads has become modestly positive, ranging from 0.31 for the correlation between Brent and the market’s investment grade index and 0.52 for the correlation between Brent and the high yield index. Now, when Brent rises, spreads widen. And when Brent falls, spreads tighten. This is consistent with a market concerned about inflation and the risk that it squeezes corporate earnings either through higher rates or through other higher input costs. The biggest jump in correlation has come in high yield, where sensitivity to cost of debt and other inputs is the highest.
Again, caveats. The correlations between Brent and risk spreads tops out at 0.52, meaning only (0.52)2 or 27% of the variance is explained at most. The other 73% or more comes from other effects.
Rates and risk assets
The shift in market focus from growth toward inflation also shows up in the changing correlations between rates and risk spreads. Before the war, rates and risk spreads tended to move in opposite directions. When rates went up, spreads tightened. And when rates went down, spreads widened. That led to negative correlations characteristic of a market focused on growth (Exhibit 3).
Exhibit 3: Changing correlations between rates, risk spreads

Note: PreWar spans 12/1/2025 to 2/27/2026 while War spans 2/28/2026 to 5/28/2026. Correlations are between daily changes. MBS, IG and HY OAS from Bloomberg market indices.
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets.
Since the war started, those negative correlations have disappeared as inflation has become a bigger concern. The impact on MBS is especially pronounced—the correlation between 10-year rates and MBS OAS rising from -0.04 to 0.61— although a good theory for that is unclear. It is possible the market has become more sensitive to changing MBS convexity, although it is not clear why war or oil would trigger that.
Market implications
A modest portion of daily volatility in rates and spreads now depends on oil and its downstream impact on inflation and growth. That should affect relative value and risk calculations and hedge ratios, among other things. Given the stalemate between the US and Iran, this looks unlikely to change for months if not longer.
* * *
The view in rates
The very front end of the curve is probably stuck at a floor of 3.65% or higher depending on US-Iran and expected short-term inflation. The 10-year note continues to look like it will spend more time above 4.25% than below it for the balance of the year. It would take a credible ceasefire in the Middle East and concrete steps toward a lasting agreement between the US and Iran for 10-year yields to drop below 4.25%.
Key market levels:
- Setting on 3-month term SOFR traded Friday at 366 bp, nearly unchanged for 12 weeks.
- Further out the curve, the 2-year note traded Friday at 4.00, down 7 bp over two weeks. The 10-year note traded at 4.43%, down 16 bp.
- The Treasury yield curve traded Friday with 2s10s at 43 bp, flatter by 9 bp over the last two weeks, with 5s30s at 83 bp, flatter by 3 bp
- Breakeven 10-year inflation traded Friday at 240 bp, down 11 bp over the last two weeks, with 5-year forward 5-year breakeven at 223 bp, down 3 bp and still signaling confidence that the Fed target still holds. The 10-year real rate finished the week at 203 bp, down 3 bp over the last two weeks.
The view in spreads
The supply and demand balance looks constructive for MBS and a little less so for corporate debt. MBS net supply continues to run very low while Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac continue to add to their mortgage portfolios. Insurers continue to issue annuities and buy corporate and structured credit, but credit is facing significant needs to finance the current AI buildout. MBS spreads should be able to hold their ground in most circumstances, but credit spreads look soft depending on the volume of net issuance.
The Bloomberg US investment grade corporate bond index OAS traded on Friday at 72 bp, tighter by 2 bp in the last two weeks. Nominal par 30-year MBS spreads to the blend of 5- and 10-year Treasury yields traded Friday at 109 bp, tighter by 6 bp in the last two weeks. Par 30-year MBS TOAS closed Friday at 20 bp, tighter by 1 bp in the last two weeks.
The view in credit
Haves and have nots continue. Big companies have healthier balance sheets than smaller companies. Consumers at the middle-to-higher end of the income distribution also have liquidity and wealth. Bank lending to non-bank financial institutions, including private debt funds and business development companies continues to expand. Bank regulators continue to focus on that category of lending, which could eventually tighten the private credit markets. But for now, credit metrics for NBFI lending are strong relative to traditional bank lending such as C&I.

