By the Numbers

A private-label MBS buyer’s guide for 2026

| December 5, 2025

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.

Investors in non-agency MBS need to start thinking about positioning for next year. Faster prepayments and increasing issuer calls should make discount exposures across non-QM and second liens a straightforward way to add performance. Investors in prime MBS at the top of the capital structure should skew purchases toward par-priced agency-eligible investor pass-throughs and sequentials, which should continue to deliver relatively attractive carry. Faster jumbo speeds should point investors to discount pass-throughs or shifting interest subordinates that should benefit from faster speeds.

Non-QM and second liens likely to fuel continued growth of the PLS market

The private-label market grew by nearly 30% this year. Securitizations of non-QM and second lien collateral fueled much of that growth, increasing by 66% and 81% respectively (Exhibit 1). With these two exposures poised to continue to grow next year, investors should remain focused on these asset classes along with securitizations backed by prime loans.

Exhibit 1: Non-QM and second liens drive PLS growth

Source: Santander US Capital Markets, CreditFlow

Call activity likely to rise in non-QM

The latter half of this year has seen somewhat elevated call activity among sponsors of non-QM securitizations. Invictus and Lone Star Funds have been the most active, but permanent capital sponsors including Annaly, Rithm and Angel Oak have called deals as well. The majority of call activity has been localized to 2022 vintage transactions as they have rolled into the three-year call window. Some 2020 vintage deals have been called as well (Exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2: Call activity increases in 2020 and 2022 vintage non-QM deals

Source: Santander US Capital Markets, Intex Solutions, Bloomberg LP

Deals from 2022 were issued against the backdrop of aggressively increasing front-end rates and widening spreads, which squeezed levels of excess spread and reduced securitization advance rates, hampering securitization economics. As a result, sponsors of these deals have substantial incentive to call and re-lever these deals, especially if rates in the front end of the yield curve continue to drop with a potentially more dovish Fed next year.

Deals from 2020 and to some extent 2021 may get called more often as well next year. De-levered transactions that have seen a material increase in sponsors’ cost-of-funds as lower cost, pro-rata pay debt at the top of the capital structure has paid down or in some instances paid off almost entirely. From the asset side of the transaction, these calls look modestly uneconomic, but not materially so. With 7.0% gross WAC new originations trading at roughly $103, most 2020 vintage deals are roughly 150 bp out-of-the money relative to current production. Assuming a roughly 3-year duration on the lower gross WAC ‘tails’ of these 2020 vintage deals would imply that these pools should be trading a roughly a one-point discount to par when multiplying the coupon differential times the duration to estimate the discount.

Given the relatively small discount, it could be offset by hedges that the sponsor put in place, although payer swaptions would likely be struck to the first call date given the lack of step-up in most 2020 vintage transactions and would have long since expired. Alternatively, the discrepancy between the market price of the loans and par could be offset via sponsors reducing their call basis through ownership of discount subordinate bonds. Additionally, sponsors may be incentivized to call these transactions simply given the nature and duration of the funds in which the equity resides. The sponsor may have to return capital after five years assuming a two-year invest, three-year harvest structure for limited partners in the funds, facilitating the need to call the deal and either sell the loans or re- lever them through securitization to raise cash to return to investors.

These trends collectively create opportunity for investors to capitalize on elevated call activity to the extent that they can source discount bonds that will pull to par at call. The best opportunity may be in investment grade subs 2020 and 2021 vintage where the majority of the lower cost, senior debt stack has been paid down or senior 2022 and 2023 vintage seniors that were issued during periods of relatively lower benchmark rates and tighter spreads. To date, it appears the market has put some weight on sponsors calling lower WAC deals. 2020 and 2021 vintage deals price to 10 CPR despite empirical speeds generally being much slower. Implicit in that assumption is some probability that these deals will pay 100 CPR at call and the 10 CPR assumption is a ‘blend’ of empirical speeds and call probability. It seems likely that bets placed on those calls may hit with increasing frequency next year.

Prime speeds spiked in recent months, look likely to remain fast

Speeds on 2023 and later vintage prime jumbo deals surged in the October remittance cycle and remained fast last month. Investors in higher loan balance collateral have always been exposed to elevated prepayment risk as smaller amounts of incentive translate to larger nominal savings for larger loan borrowers. This risk may be more acute now than in years past as certain conforming balances have pushed well north of $1 million, dragging securitized non-conforming balances higher. In addition to higher balances, persistently elevated mortgage rates have likely made higher balance borrowers increasingly sensitive to any ability to reduce existing debt burdens as evidenced by fast speeds in 2025 vintage deals.

Absent a material bear steepening of the yield curve that would push the majority of recent jumbo originations out-of-the-money, speeds on jumbo collateral look likely to remain fast. This should push investors at the top of the capital structure in jumbo deals into discount pass-throughs. And credit investors should favor discounted shifting interest subordinate classes over other exposures as fast prepayments will both de-lever the senior portion of the capital structure, increasing credit support and tightening spreads on longer spread duration shifting interest subs, and shorten the bonds, generating excess returns through a pull to par.

Prime investors at the top of the capital structure seeking refuge from fast jumbo speeds could also skew private-label allocations to agency-eligible investor collateral as those loans have paid significantly slower than recent vintage prime jumbo (Exhibit 3.) While differences in new issue spreads between jumbo and investor pass-throughs have widened to some degree, the convexity in investor collateral still appears to be mispriced.  At an absolute minimum, bond investors are offered significant prepayment protection from the fact that the average balances of loans securitized in prime investor trusts are a fraction of jumbo balances. Furthermore, there may be a more muted refinancing response to higher LTV, higher SATO agency-eligible loans securitized in private-label trusts than lower LTV ones more commonly purchased by the GSEs as originators will likely look to refinance lower LTV loans with less friction to refinancing than higher LTV ones.

Exhibit 3: Investor speeds have remained relatively muted compared to prime jumbo

Source: Santander US Capital Markets, Core Logic Loan Performance

Agency-eligible investor pass-throughs also compare favorably to agency specified pools. With 5.5% pass-throughs trading at a 12/32 concession to TBA and 5.5% specified investor pools trading at an 11/32 pay-up in the most recent GSE cash window auction, that price differential translates to a 30 bp pickup in OAS in the private-label pass-through (Exhibit 4). Admittedly, investors should demand some concession for lower liquidity in private-label bonds, but the cost of liquidity is notoriously difficult to value, and 30 bp may be more than fair compensation for buy-and-hold investors with stickier funding and capital.

Exhibit 4: Investor pass-throughs offer a substantial OAS pickup versus specified pools

Source: Santander US Capital Markets, YieldBook

Screening for convexity in second liens

Capitalizing on elevated speeds in second liens is somewhat more challenging as the majority of the capital stack is par-priced at issue. Investors may find select discount bonds that were issued against the backdrop of higher rates or wider spreads but a further rally in the front end of the yield curve may push these bonds above par. Given this, investors may be relegated to shelf selection to protect against elevated speeds. To date, dealer shelves including JPPMT and GSMBS along with the Saluda Grade shelves have been faster at-the-money than originator and other sponsor shelves as originators may be less inclined to solicit second to second refinances to keep speeds contained and protect elevated premiums on future whole loan sales (Exhibit 5).

Exhibit 5: Dealer shelves prepay faster in second liens

Source: Santander US Capital Markets, CoreLogic LP

Prepayment speeds on second liens may decelerate somewhat organically as home price appreciation slows as many refinancing opportunities have been borne of incentive created via borrower deleveraging through a combination of amortization on lower coupon seasoned first liens coupled and substantial home price appreciation. Until then, investors will be well served to opportunistically buy bonds at a discount and allocate capital to shelves that have exhibited slower speeds across varying rates of refinancing incentive.

Chris Helwig
christopher.helwig@santander.us
1 (646) 776-7872

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2026 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

Important disclaimers for clients in the EU and UK

This publication has been prepared by Trading Desk Strategists within the Sales and Trading functions of Santander US Capital Markets LLC (“SanCap”), the US registered broker-dealer of Santander Corporate & Investment Banking. This communication is distributed in the EEA by Banco Santander S.A., a credit institution registered in Spain and authorised and regulated by the Bank of Spain and the CNMV. Any EEA recipient of this communication that would like to affect any transaction in any security or issuer discussed herein should do so with Banco Santander S.A. or any of its affiliates (together “Santander”). This communication has been distributed in the UK by Banco Santander, S.A.’s London branch, authorised by the Bank of Spain and subject to regulatory oversight on certain matters by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).

The publication is intended for exclusive use for Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by MiFID II and is not intended for use by retail customers or for any persons or entities in any jurisdictions or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

This material is not a product of Santander´s Research Team and does not constitute independent investment research. This is a marketing communication and may contain ¨investment recommendations¨ as defined by the Market Abuse Regulation 596/2014 ("MAR"). This publication has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The author, date and time of the production of this publication are as indicated herein.

This publication does not constitute investment advice and may not be relied upon to form an investment decision, nor should it be construed as any offer to sell or issue or invitation to purchase, acquire or subscribe for any instruments referred herein. The publication has been prepared in good faith and based on information Santander considers reliable as of the date of publication, but Santander does not guarantee or represent, express or implied, that such information is accurate or complete. All estimates, forecasts and opinions are current as at the date of this publication and are subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise indicated, Santander does not intend to update this publication. The views and commentary in this publication may not be objective or independent of the interests of the Trading and Sales functions of Santander, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to herein and/or may receive compensation from investment banking and non-investment banking services from entities mentioned herein. Santander may trade as principal, make a market or hold positions in instruments (or related derivatives) and/or hold financial interest in entities discussed herein. Santander may provide market commentary or trading strategies to other clients or engage in transactions which may differ from views expressed herein. Santander may have acted upon the contents of this publication prior to you having received it.

This publication is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient and must not be reproduced, redistributed or transmitted, in whole or in part, without Santander’s consent. The recipient agrees to keep confidential at all times information contained herein.

The Library

Search Articles