The Big Idea

Bank investing during wartime

| May 16, 2025

This material is a Marketing Communication and does not constitute Independent Investment Research.

While the outbreak of tariff war in April left many corporate and institutional investment decisions on hold, banks seemed to step into the breach. Credit provided through bank securities purchases and loans suddenly accelerated. Not all securities or borrowers got the same treatment. There were favorites. But banks have served as a stabilizing force so far in this disruption. What a difference a decade or so makes.

Bank credit: all securities and loans

If uncertainty over tariffs forced corporations and institutional portfolios to put major investments on hold, it did not seem to have that effect on banks. The aggregate extension of bank credit through loans and securities had expanded through March at an annualized monthly rate just above 3% (Exhibit 1). But by the end of April, growth in credit had accelerated to nearly 4.7%. Bank credit in April expanded by $190 billion. But not all credit expanded equally. In both securities and loans, a single category in each led the way.

Exhibit 1: Extension of bank credit—securities and loans—accelerated in April

Source: Federal Reserve H.8, Santander US Capital Markets

Securities

In securities, banks shifted their purchases sharply after April’s Liberation Day, adding Treasury debt at the fastest monthly pace in at least a year. Annualized monthly growth in bank Treasury holdings started April at 7.3% and ended at 51% (Exhibit 2). That amounted to a $76 billion bump in Treasury holdings. ABS grew by a much more tepid annualized 5.7%, adding $4.2 billion. MBS slid by an annualized 3.4%, balances there falling after Liberation Day by $7.5 billion.

Exhibit 2: Banks’ marginal holdings of Treasury debt jumped in April

Source: Federal Reserve H.8, Santander US Capital Markets

Some mix of higher yields, liquidity, zero risk-weighting and spread over the SOFR swap curve likely drew the strong bank Treasury bid. Banks could have bought a 5-year Treasury note and used a SOFR swap to turn it into a SOFR + 38 bp asset, for example, or bought 10-year note and swapped it into SOFR + 53 bp. April offered the best swap levels of the year.

April’s higher rates also may have made banks cautious on MBS. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in March 2023 have left many of their former peers reluctant to take negative convexity. That has increased bank use of CMOs, which would be difficult if not impossible to scale at the same pace as Treasuries.

Banks have loaded up on Treasury exposure over the last 12 months at the fastest pace of any earning asset—either securities or loans. Treasury balances finished April at $1.86 trillion, up 15% from a year ago. MBS balances finished at $2.68 trillion, up from a year ago by a more modest 5.3%. And ABS finished at $893 billion, down from a year ago by 1%.

In general, securities continued to grow through April as a share of banks’ credit book—securities and loans. Securities’ share has been rising since late 2023, rebounding from an earlier drop after a combination of higher interest rates and the negative convexity of MBS left significant unrealized losses on the balance sheet (Exhibit 3). Through hedging of assets such as agency CMBS and purchases of capped floating-rate CMOs, banks have rebuilt some of their positions.

Exhibit 3: Banks continue to rebuild securities’ share of earning assets

Source: Federal Reserve H.8, Santander US Capital Markets

Loans

On the lending side—the other 70% of the credit book—banks kept the cash flowing despite the uncertainty in April, especially loans to portfolios of private debt. The balances of loans to non-depository financial institutions such as mortgage banks, online lenders and private equity along with loans not classified elsewhere started April growing at an annualized 17.9% and ended at 30.9% (Exhibit 4). Those balances rose by nearly $61 billion. Consumer lending also picked up, starting April growing at an annualized 4.8% and ending at 9.2%. Those balances rose by nearly $17 billion. Other forms of lending—C&I, mortgage loans, and commercial real estate—continued to grow roughly at their earlier pace through April

Exhibit 4: All lending, especially to portfolios of private debt, grew through April

Note: Other loans include loans to non-depository financial institutions and loans not elsewhere classified.
Source: Federal Reserve H.8, Santander US Capital Markets

It is hard to know what prompted the faster growth in lending to private debt portfolios and to consumers. Many companies anecdotally have suspended major investments and presumably would not need new debt. But it is possible after the April 9 pause in tariffs that some corporate and individual borrowers decided to accelerate purchases of imported goods and needed credit for the purchases.

The April growth in loans to non-depository financial institutions and other borrowers continued a year-long trend that has made this lending category the fastest growing one among commercial banks. Through April, it was up 14% year-over-year and now tallies $2.4 trillion, not far behind commercial real estate loans ($3.0 trillion), C&I ($2.8 trillion) and residential real estate ($2.6 trillion) and ahead of consumer ($1.9 trillion).

Reallocation away from cash assets and into securities and loans

With the credit book rising $190 billion, it raises the question of where the cash came from for the investments, and it look like it came from reserves. The cash category on the balance sheet, which is vault cash and a few other things but mainly reserves at the Fed, fell after Liberation Day at an annualized monthly rate of nearly 114% (Exhibit 5). In absolute terms, that was down $321 billion, more than enough to cover a reallocation to the credit book. Of course, those balances could also reflect the impact of April tax payments by bank customers. Balances held in cash assets can be volatile since that category usually changes to meet needs elsewhere on the balance sheet. April was a case in point.

Exhibit 5: Cash assets, mainly reserves, dropped sharply after Liberation Day

Source: Federal Reserve H.8, Santander US Capital Markets

The Big Picture

The Big Picture from April was that banks seemed to step in and provide liquidity to both the Treasury market and, indirectly, to private lenders and consumers. At least in the April episode of tariff wars, banks seemed to have played a stabilizing role. Things clearly have come a long way since 2008.

* * *

The view in rates

The market closed on Friday pricing fed funds at 3.81% to end the year, less than 7 bp below the Fed’s March dots. The steady reversal over the last few weeks of market expectations for cuts this year likely reflects a series of messages from Fed speakers about the risk of inflation from tariffs. The Fed looks prepared to wait until it has a better view of whether tariffs will bring a 1-time price change or more persistent inflation.

Moody’s downgrade of the US from ‘AAA’ to ‘Aa1’ on Friday will almost certainly get more investors focused on US fiscal policy and debt. Debt-to-GDP is at 100% and expected to grow over the next decade to 117%. The budget bill moving through Congress could push it higher. That promises to add term premium to the yield curve, steepening the curve.

Other key market levels:

  • Fed RRP balances closed at $137 billion as of Friday, down on $5 billion in the last week
  • Setting on 3-month term SOFR closed Friday at 432 bp, up 2 bp in the last week
  • Further out the curve, the 2-year note traded Friday at 4.00%, up 11 bp in the last week. The 10-year note traded at 4.48%, up 10 bp in the last week.
  • The Treasury yield curve traded Friday with 2s10s at 48 bp, flatter by 1 bp in the last week. The 5s30s traded Friday at 85 bp, steeper by 2 bp over the same period
  • Breakeven 10-year inflation traded Friday at 236 bp, up 5 bp in the last week. The 10-year real rate finished the week at 211 bp, up 5 bp in the last week.

The view in spreads

Moody’s downgrade of the US could push credit spreads out slightly, but that should quickly take a back seat to developments in tariffs. The de-escalation by the US and China a week ago has taken significant risk out of the market by showing China’s willingness to talk and possibly compromise. There is still significant risk of escalation with other trading counterparties, but China is a big one. That explains the tightening in risk spreads in the last week. The Bloomberg US investment grade corporate bond index OAS traded on Friday at 90 bp, tighter by 9 bp in the last week. Nominal par 30-year MBS spreads to the blend of 5- and 10-year Treasury yields traded Friday at 149 bp, tighter by 3 bp in the last week. Par 30-year MBS TOAS closed Friday at 34 bp, wider by 1 bp in the last week.

The view in credit

Tariffs should weaken most credits assuming slower growth, and hit specific credits hard based on exposure to cross-border trade flows. Excess returns from the first week of tariff war point to the specific sectors more or less exposed to tariff. We have been watching cracks in credit quality at the weaker end of the credit distribution for months. Fundamentals for the average of the distribution continue to look stable. Most investment grade corporate and most consumer balance sheets have fixed-rate funding so falling rates have limited immediate effect. Consumer debt service coverage is roughly at 2019 levels. However, serious delinquencies in FHA mortgages and in credit cards held by consumers with the lowest credit scores have been accelerating. Consumers in the lowest tier of income look vulnerable. The balance sheets of smaller companies show signs of rising leverage and lower operating margins. Leveraged loans also are showing signs of stress, with the combination of payment defaults and liability management exercises, or LMEs, often pursued instead of bankruptcy, back to 2020 post-Covid peaks. If the Fed only eases slowly this year, fewer leveraged companies will be able to outrun interest rates, and signs of stress should increase. LMEs are very opaque transactions, so a material increase could make important parts of the leveraged loan market hard to evaluate.

Steven Abrahams
steven.abrahams@santander.us
1 (646) 776-7864

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2026 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

Important disclaimers for clients in the EU and UK

This publication has been prepared by Trading Desk Strategists within the Sales and Trading functions of Santander US Capital Markets LLC (“SanCap”), the US registered broker-dealer of Santander Corporate & Investment Banking. This communication is distributed in the EEA by Banco Santander S.A., a credit institution registered in Spain and authorised and regulated by the Bank of Spain and the CNMV. Any EEA recipient of this communication that would like to affect any transaction in any security or issuer discussed herein should do so with Banco Santander S.A. or any of its affiliates (together “Santander”). This communication has been distributed in the UK by Banco Santander, S.A.’s London branch, authorised by the Bank of Spain and subject to regulatory oversight on certain matters by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).

The publication is intended for exclusive use for Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by MiFID II and is not intended for use by retail customers or for any persons or entities in any jurisdictions or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

This material is not a product of Santander´s Research Team and does not constitute independent investment research. This is a marketing communication and may contain ¨investment recommendations¨ as defined by the Market Abuse Regulation 596/2014 ("MAR"). This publication has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The author, date and time of the production of this publication are as indicated herein.

This publication does not constitute investment advice and may not be relied upon to form an investment decision, nor should it be construed as any offer to sell or issue or invitation to purchase, acquire or subscribe for any instruments referred herein. The publication has been prepared in good faith and based on information Santander considers reliable as of the date of publication, but Santander does not guarantee or represent, express or implied, that such information is accurate or complete. All estimates, forecasts and opinions are current as at the date of this publication and are subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise indicated, Santander does not intend to update this publication. The views and commentary in this publication may not be objective or independent of the interests of the Trading and Sales functions of Santander, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to herein and/or may receive compensation from investment banking and non-investment banking services from entities mentioned herein. Santander may trade as principal, make a market or hold positions in instruments (or related derivatives) and/or hold financial interest in entities discussed herein. Santander may provide market commentary or trading strategies to other clients or engage in transactions which may differ from views expressed herein. Santander may have acted upon the contents of this publication prior to you having received it.

This publication is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient and must not be reproduced, redistributed or transmitted, in whole or in part, without Santander’s consent. The recipient agrees to keep confidential at all times information contained herein.

The Library

Search Articles