The Big Idea
The lingering price of Liberation Day
Steven Abrahams | May 9, 2025
This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.
Liberation Day has changed global markets in equities, rates, foreign exchange, credit and options. Those changes seem to reflect lower expectations for global growth and earnings, a rotation of debt capital out of the US and lingering uncertainty about where things go from here. The impact has not disappeared, which means markets still are worried.
Equity returns
Equity market returns suggest Liberation Day has lowered global expectations for growth and earnings. US markets underperformed other major global markets except Japan before Liberation Day and have since seen other markets join its decline (Exhibit 1). US markets in February and March had to price in bearish news of tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico and new tariffs on all imported steel and aluminum. Europe meanwhile priced in bullish news of significant new fiscal spending by Germany and potential new defense spending by other countries. Asia was mixed with Japan down and China up. But since Liberation Day, most indices have dropped further across markets with the exception of the NASDAQ, the DAX and the Nikkei. Tariff exemptions for some of the biggest technology companies may be helping the NASDAQ, and Germany’s fiscal plans may be buoying the DAX.
Exhibit 1: Equity market returns before and after Liberation Day
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets
Global sovereign rates
Liberation Day has also triggered a significant pivot in global rates consistent with allocation of debt capital away from the US. The US saw a drop in rates across the yield curve before Liberation Day with German and Japanese curves generally rising and steepening (Exhibit 2). After Liberation Day, the US curve has pivoted to higher and steeper yields while Germany and Japan have pivoted to lower and steeper curves. This pivot could reflect changing expectations for growth, inflation and monetary policy across these markets. But swap spreads in these markets—tighter spreads in the US and wider spreads in the EU—suggest it is not just fundamentals and monetary policy.
Exhibit 2: Rate changes before and after Liberation Day (bp)
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets
Foreign exchange markets
Foreign exchange markets show a steady drop in the value of the dollar both before and after Liberation Day (Exhibit 3). Devaluation before Liberation Day seems understandable as the interest rate difference between the US and other countries fell, reducing the advantage of converting local currency into dollars and investing in higher yielding US debt. But after Liberation Day, as the interest rate difference began to widen again, the US dollar might be expected to rally against other currencies. It did not. Since Liberation Day, the dollar is down against other free-floating currencies by 1.8% go to 5.7%. This is also consistent with rotation out of US dollar assets.
Exhibit 3: The changing price of $1 before and after Liberation Day
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets
Credit markets
Liberation Day has also broadly raised the price of credit. Spreads on US risk assets before Liberation Day suggest rotation out of credit and into agency MBS, with investment grade spreads wider by 15 bp, high yield by 47 bp and agency MBS tighter by 6 bp (Exhibit 4). Spreads on European credits before Liberation Day tightened by 2 bp. But after Liberation Day, all spreads have widened. Broadly wider spreads are consistent with falling expectations for growth and earnings.
Exhibit 4: Changing risk spreads before and after Liberation Day (bp)
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets
Options markets
Finally, options markets have a mixed message about the level of uncertainty among investors. Implied volatility for US equity rose nearly 24% before Liberation Day with implied volatility for US rates up more than 7% (Exhibit 5). After Liberation Day, implied volatility for US equity has remained slightly higher than before while implied volatility for US rates has dropped. Uncertainty remains elevated, although down dramatically from the peak just before the April 9 pause in US reciprocal tariffs.
Exhibit 5: Uncertainty before and after Liberation Day (% change)
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets
The path from here
The 90-day pause on US reciprocal tariffs ends on July 8, which means the news over the July Fourth weekend will probably be consumed with marking progress on negotiations ahead of the deadline. Work from the Peterson Institute shows that past trade deals have taken an average of 18 months to get done. This time may be different, but it seems unrealistic to expect more than a couple of detailed deals to get inked before July 8. That will leave the market to interpret the direction of travel at that point. We may have seen the worst on April 8 before the pause, but a lingering price of Liberation Day is almost certain to persist until July 8 and likely for a long time afterwards.
* * *
The view in rates
The market closed on Friday pricing fed funds at 3.65% to end the year, 22 bp below the Fed’s March dots. The steady reversal over the last few weeks of market expectations for cuts this year likely reflects a series of messages from Fed speakers about the risk of inflation from tariffs. The Fed looks prepared to wait until it has a better view of whether tariffs will bring a 1-time price change or more persistent inflation.
Other key market levels:
- Fed RRP balances closed at $142 billion as of Friday, down on $6 billion in the last week
- Setting on 3-month term SOFR closed Friday at 430 bp, up 6 bp in the last week
- Further out the curve, the 2-year note traded Friday at 3.89%, down 4 bp in the last week. The 10-year note traded at 4.38%, up 7 bp in the last week.
- The Treasury yield curve traded Friday with 2s10s at 49 bp, steeper by 1 bp in the last week. The 5s30s traded Friday at 83 bp, flatter by 4 bp over the same period
- Breakeven 10-year inflation traded Friday at 231 bp, up 4 bp in the last week. The 10-year real rate finished the week at 206 bp, up 2 bp in the last week.
The view in spreads
Bearish on credit spreads with US trade policy in flux. The Bloomberg US investment grade corporate bond index OAS traded on Friday at 99 bp, wider by 4tighter by 7 bp in the last week. Nominal par 30-year MBS spreads to the blend of 5- and 10-year Treasury yields traded Friday at 152 bp, tighter by 6 bp in the last week. Par 30-year MBS TOAS closed Friday at 33 bp, tighter by 5 bp in the last week.
The view in credit
Tariffs should weaken most credits assuming slower growth, and hit specific credits hard based on exposure to cross-border trade flows. Excess returns from the first week of tariff war point to the specific sectors more or less exposed to tariff. We have been watching cracks in credit quality at the weaker end of the credit distribution for months. Fundamentals for the average of the distribution continue to look stable. Most investment grade corporate and most consumer balance sheets have fixed-rate funding so falling rates have limited immediate effect. Consumer debt service coverage is roughly at 2019 levels. However, serious delinquencies in FHA mortgages and in credit cards held by consumers with the lowest credit scores have been accelerating. Consumers in the lowest tier of income look vulnerable. The balance sheets of smaller companies show signs of rising leverage and lower operating margins. Leveraged loans also are showing signs of stress, with the combination of payment defaults and liability management exercises, or LMEs, often pursued instead of bankruptcy, back to 2020 post-Covid peaks. If the Fed only eases slowly this year, fewer leveraged companies will be able to outrun interest rates, and signs of stress should increase. LMEs are very opaque transactions, so a material increase could make important parts of the leveraged loan market hard to evaluate.