By the Numbers

Shopping a $14 billion portfolio

| April 21, 2023

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.

This article has been corrected and updated to reflect that the Silicon Valley and Signature Bank securities portfolios are not eligible collateral for financing at the Fed’s Bank Term Funding Program.

Speculation has built around the potential market impact of the $14 billion liquidation of agency CMBS formerly held by Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. The holdings are overwhelmingly comprised of recent vintage, low coupon Ginnie Mae project loans whose indicative market values are substantially below par, but not low enough to make the assets positive carry. The size of the portfolio relative to outstanding issuance, and low liquidity in secondary trading of Ginnie Mae project loans also make such a liquidation challenging. There are three potential outcomes: a deep price cut to attract either a broker-dealer or levered buyers; a strong bank buyer who would likely negotiate long-term financing similar to that offered by the Fed’s bank term funding facility; or a Fed sponsored Maiden Lane type facility which would take ownership of the assets and manage them over time.

There are some idiosyncrasies about the Ginnie Mae project loan market and the characteristics of the bonds that are likely to make the sale of the portfolio challenging:

  • Ginnie Mae securities are fully guaranteed by the US government and have a 0% risk weighting when calculating capital requirements. The natural buyer of the principal and interest classes are banks, insurance companies, pension funds and Federal Home Loan Banks. The securities are typically classified as held-to-maturity assets.
  • The secondary market for Ginnie Mae project loans is thin in normal circumstances. The current environment where held-to-maturity portfolios are under intense scrutiny has significantly curtailed the potential buyer base.
  • The GNPL bonds held by Signature Valley Bank (SVB) were almost entirely from the 2020 and 2021 vintages, which have an average coupon of 1.62%, an average WAC of 2.72% and WAL of 4.5 years assuming a prepayment speed of 15 CPJ (Exhibit 1). Although 15 CPJ often used for par coupon bonds at new issue, it’s an unrealistic speed assumption for current pricing of these securities.

Exhibit 1: Selection of SVB GNPL holdings

Note: This shows a subset of the GNPL SVB holdings transferred to the FDIC. A complete list is available upon request.
Source: FDIC, Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets

Even priced at 15 CPJ the average discount dollar price across the portfolio is 83.75; that’s still too high given that project loans deep out-of-the-money to refinance historically prepay at 0 to 5 CPJ. As an example, one of the bonds in the portfolio is the GNR 2021-151 AB security (Exhibit 2). It has a 1.75% coupon and a 2.95% WAC. Current project loan commitment rates are 4.75% to 5.00%, meaning the borrowers are about 200 bp out-of-the-money to refinance.

Exhibit 2: Example yield analysis using adjusted pricing

Note: Analysis as of 4/21/2023.
Source: Bloomberg, Santander Capital Markets US

The yield table analysis shows two potential prices for this security: one with a 78 handle and one with a 75 handle. At a flat 78 dollar price and 2 CPJ the yield rises to 4.15% with a J-spread of 48 bp. At 5 CPJ the yield is 5.04% and the J-spread is 148 bp. A rise in prepayment speeds over time, which will almost certainly happen but could take several years, would result in even higher yields.

In the short term, with prepayment speeds slow and the front end of the curve steeply inverted, the bond is likely to remain persistently negative carry at speeds below 5 CPJ because the yield on the bond is lower than financing cost. There are two important caveats:

  • The carry is not nearly as negative as it looks even at 0 CPJ because of the deep discount dollar price
  • Layering on a pay-fixed, receive-floating swap with the same notional as the market value of the bond will not only hedge the interest rate risk, but will also result in a portfolio that is positive carry.

A note about carry

The shortcut for estimating carry is subtract the financing cost, typically the overnight or term repo rate in percent, from the yield of the bond. This estimate works great for fixed-rate bonds, with principal that cannot be prepaid, trading roughly at par. For example, the 5-year on-the-run Treasury security (T 3.625 3/31/28) has a yield of 3.626% and is trading about a quarter tick below par. Assuming a repo rate of 4.83%, the estimated carry in percent would be 3.626% – 4.83% = -1.20% annually, in a static rate environment.

This shortcut is problematic for any bonds trading at a significant discount or premium from par, and for mortgages where prepayments can dramatically alter the cash flows and impact the yield. The actual carry on the bond can be higher than estimated when securities are at a deep discount, because the coupon and principal is earned on the face amount while the repo interest is paid on the market value. The reverse is also true for bonds trading at a premium.

In the case of the GNPL portfolio that is being liquidated, although the coupon interest rates on the securities are rather low, the principal and interest securities in the portfolio benefit from principal payments due to scheduled amortization. These payments can about double the monthly cash flow received, even in the early years when prepayments tend to be low. For example, the GNR 2021-151 AB has a 1.75% interest coupon with an amortization schedule that is adding about 1.71% in principal payments each month, for a combined cash flow of 3.46% of the face amount for the current month (Exhibit 3). To date, this bond has at lifetime CPR of 3, but has had zero prepayments for the last year. At a 78.00 price, the negative carry is only -0.47%, even at 0 CPR. A market price with a 71 handle to make the carry flat at 0 CPR.

Exhibit 3: Projected carry calculation for GNPL assuming 78.00 price, 0 CPR, 0 CPD

Note: *annual principal and interest payments not corrected for 30/360 day count. The scheduled principal payments typically rise slowly over time due to the underlying amortization schedules. In the early years the principal payments rise by about 0.5 to 1 bp per month. Repo interest calculation is not adjusted for coupon payments and declining principal balance; haircuts and/or overcollateralization not included.
Source: Bloomberg, Santander Capital Markets

Current overnight repo rates are about 4.83% and heading higher, assuming the FOMC raises the short rate to 5.25% at the May meeting. Prepayments in recently issued Ginnie Mae project loans deep out-of-the-money to refinance will likely stay low until the Fed eventually starts to ease and/or borrowers build up enough property price appreciation to make a sale attractive.

Finding an interested buyer

Hedge funds and private equity investors might be willing to buy the portfolio and lever it up given a 5% haircut on financing, since they tend to hedge the interest rate risk and the pay-fixed swap is positive carry.  The required discount could be less for total return investors looking at longer holding periods.

A strong bank could buy the portfolio on the condition that the Fed or another counterparty is willing to finance the securities on a non-mark-to-market basis at below-market rates, similar to the terms recently established by the Fed’s Bank Term Funding Program. The facility lends money against the par value of the securities, not the market value, at an advance rate of 1-year OIS plus 10 bp. A bank could currently renew that funding for at least two years, through March 2025.

All that being said, there is still a lot of duration, prepayment and financing risk for either buyer. The securities are also fairly illiquid, and relative to the modest amount of secondary trading in the market, the portfolio the FDIC is trying to sell is gigantic (Exhibit 4). Prior to the pandemic, total issuance in Ginnie Mae project loans was $15 to $20 billion per year. There is currently $65 billion outstanding of Ginnie Mae project loans of 2020 and 2021 vintages, and the SVB portfolio holds about $12 billion of that, or 18.5%. Any buyer is probably going to have to plan to hold the portfolio to maturity.

Exhibit 4: GNPL issuance and outstanding

Note: The table summarizes GNPL deal issuance and outstanding balances. The vintage is the year the deal was issued. Amounts in millions. Data as of 4/12/2023.
Source: Bloomberg, Santander US Capital Markets

The Maiden Lane option

In reality, it seems unlikely that the FDIC and BlackRock will be willing to cut the price of the portfolio enough to attract a leveraged investor. Bank investors could eventually emerge, but given the enormous scrutiny on earnings amid commercial real estate rumblings, it seems unlikely that the portfolio could be sold off in a timely fashion.

That leaves the strategy that many have been suggesting since the collapse – that the Fed should set up a fund similar to the Maiden Lane LLCs that took over the risky assets of Bear Stearns that JP Morgan and other banks shunned at the time. It’s unclear what the political risk might be from taking over the the portfolio, but it potentially presents the least risk to the financial markets, which would struggle to digest it.

Mary Beth Fisher, PhD
1 (646) 776-7872

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

The Library

Search Articles