The Big Idea

Ecuador | Political setback

| February 10, 2023

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

For holders of Ecuador’s sovereign debt, the latest political setback for the administration of President Guillermo Lasso underscores policy risk and keeps repayment uncertainty high ahead of backloaded bond payments. The headlines coming out of the recent referendum on economic reform were also inopportune with Ecuador already vulnerable to weak market technicals. These weak technicals and uncertain medium-term debt repayment capacity explained my shift to a more cautious view last month the recommendation to reduce a tactical overallocation.

The political referendum was supposed to provide a boost to confidence and a marginal improvement in overall governability.  The results show otherwise.  The resounding “no” across all of referendum questions represent a vote of no confidence for the Lasso administration (Exhibit 1).  But worse is what is says about society and its view of economic reform.  The questions themselves were not enough to encourage broad support for even minor economic reforms across security, the environment and the legislature. There has been no in-depth discussion across the mainstream media or the social media about the implications. This is part of the problem.  There is no forum for discussion about the structural political, security and economic problems and how best to fix them.

Exhibit 1: Initial results from Ecuador’s referendum on political and economic reform

Source: https://equinocciodigital.com/2022/12/17/segun-cedatos-el-si-tiene-ventaja/, https://www.cne.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/RESOLUCION-PLE-CNE-1-6-12-2022.pdf, https://elecciones2023.cne.gob.ec/

The near final 97% results for the referendum are not ideal. The “no” vote has won across all questions.  These results clearly contradict the majority of polls that favored “yes” over “no” on all questions. It also merits an assessment of the implications for policy and political risks during and beyond the Lasso administration.

The referendum itself has limited impact near-term with questions that only targeted marginal reforms across the security, the environment and political institutions.  It’s curious that the protest vote against President Lasso dominated over the popularity of the questions themselves. The voters would rather penalize the Lasso administration on a symbolic protest vote instead of tackling security problems, strengthening political institutions or improving the environment.

This is not a victory for the opposition, with a continuing low 7% approval ratings in the legislature.  This may embolden the opposition into a more obstructionist strategy But the executive still benefits from a powerful veto and a rational judiciary that enforces checks and balances and encourages policy moderation.  The threat of impeachment is still not viable with the unpopular legislature equally facing high-risk scenarios under snap elections of the executive and the legislature. This is why the legislature was unable to rally two-thirds support for this proposal last year.  The recent setback probably doesn’t have much if any tangible near-term impact on political risks but rather only reinforces the current policy paralysis and dependence on high oil prices.

There are minimal near-term liquidity risks for Ecuador with low coupons on its bonds, high oil prices and a market-friendly Lasso administration. However, the solvency risks remain high and maybe now worse with no societal consensus for even minimal reform.  There is no cooperation to fix problems now and high uncertainty on whether there will be consensus to fix problems later. This has been the narrative behind my cautious view of the past few months and the recent recommendation to take profits last month.  This latest political setback only reinforces this pessimism and validates the highly discounted medium-term payments with no clear path to increase trend growth or decrease high structural spending.

There was a knee-jerk 8- to 10-point price drop in the immediate aftermath of the referendum with stale overweight positions vulnerable to weak technicals and surprise negative event risk. These results were a wake-up call to medium-term risks that deeply discount backloaded Eurobond payments.  There may be soon a pause to reassess at lower levels from late last year (price congestion at late Aug/early Sep).  A de-leveraging trade looks unlikely for now.  It’s difficult to commit to a high conviction view on the evolving risks over the next three years and the varying policy options through the political transition after the Lasso administration.  However, a quick recovery looks unlikely with bias to sell into strength and reduce trapped long positions.

Siobhan Morden
siobhan.morden@santander.us
1 (212) 692-2539

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

The Library

Search Articles