The Big Idea
Ecuador | Approaching a political inflection point
Siobhan Morden | January 6, 2023
This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.
This year marks a unique political cycle for Ecuador. The country on February 5 votes on a referendum that will reform political, security and environmental laws. However, success will not remove roadblocks to economic reform that perpetuate weak dollarization, low growth and uncertain debt solvency. For the Lasso administration, success would only slightly improve weak governability. Eurobonds have taken a pause from quick year-end gains ahead of the referendum next month. The successful referendum would only translate into moderate gains.
The political tensions remain high with an obstructionist majority opposition in the Assembly and ideological differences with Ecuador’s indigenous groups. However, it’s an intuitive strategy of the Lasso administration to tackle this political impasse with a referendum. The referendum is not a vote of confidence of the Lasso administration but rather a vote of no confidence in the legislature. A political strategy of weakening the legislature would capitalize on its low, single-digit approval ratings while also bypassing its authority with direct democracy on other social, economic and political issues.
The initial survey from the credible pollster CEDATOS shows 75% public support to weaken the legislature and endorse popular topics on democracy, security and the environment. The approval ratings of President Lasso may be low at 30%, but the approval ratings for the Assembly are dismal at 5.7% (latest December CEDATOS survey). This explains the high support for the question that proposes a reduction in the number of deputies. It will be important to monitor voting intentions over the next few weeks. Although the popularity of the questions should dominate, there are many special interest groups lobbying against the referendum, and 8% to 18% of voters remain undecided. The final results are based on simple majority per valid votes per individual question with partial or total success on the questions.
Source: https://equinocciodigital.com/2022/12/17/segun-cedatos-el-si-tiene-ventaja/, https://www.cne.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/RESOLUCION-PLE-CNE-1-6-12-2022.pdf
The “democratic” questions are a clear challenge to the Assembly and the CPCSS (Council of Citizen Participation and Social Control) on reducing the size of the Assembly from 137 to an estimated 121 deputies, reducing the number of political parties as well as allowing the Assembly to select CPCSS officials through a meritocratic process as opposed to popular elections. This may resolve the political fragmentation and policy paralysis with better overall accountability and legislative cooperation. The proposal to strengthen the meritocracy of the CPCCS would allow for stronger checks and balances and less political interference amongst regulators.
The successful referendum would marginally strengthen the institutions for a smaller and more accountable legislature as well as marginally improving some security and environmental issues. There could even be some spillover gains for a small boost on approval ratings from the current low levels of 20%-30% for the Lasso administration. However, none of this suggests a game changer on still unresolved structural economic and political issues.
It would require considerable momentum to not only boost the popularity back above 50% for the Lasso administration as well as encourage broad-based collaboration to tackle difficult economic issues. The social pressures reinforce huge spending entitlements such as fuel subsidies and bloated public payrolls. And there is no accountability on fiscal discipline with a rejection of tax hikes and any other efforts to attract foreign direct investment and develop strategic sectors. The crux of the problem is a structural fiscal deficit and track record of default that limits access to capital markets and discourages foreign direct investment inflows. The fiscal improvement in 2022 on trimming the historical $4 billion to $5 billion budget deficit down to $1.9 billion was impressive. However, these gains depend on high oil prices while facing spending rigidity after capex cutbacks and higher debt service.
The bottom line is that the referendum could provide some marginal leverage to the Lasso administration. However, there is no quick fix to increase trend growth or decrease high structural spending. The political uncertainty may remain high. The role of the participation council is still fluid, and tension with indigenous groups continues. The Lasso administration also has to renegotiate a successor IMF program with an uncertain mandate for economic reform and uncertain budget assumptions (volatile oil prices, temporary tax hikes, budgetary rigidity and optimistic asset sales). The uncertain political and policy risks warrant a stubborn risk premium as the Lasso administration navigates through the next phase of an IMF program and the aftermath of the referendum.
Siobhan Morden
Santander Investment Securities
1 (212) 692-2539
siobhan.morden@santander.us
U.S. Fixed Income Trading Commentary Disclaimer
This commentary has been prepared by the U.S. fixed income trading desk of Santander Investment Securities Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Santander”) for its institutional investor clients only, and may under no circumstances be redistributed beyond the recipient in whole or in part. The recipient is an “institutional account” as defined in FINRA Rule 4512(c) that (i) is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies and (ii) will exercise independent judgment in evaluating any potential investments and any recommendations of any broker-dealers. For the avoidance of doubt, this commentary is not suitable for or intended for retail investors.
This commentary has not been produced or reviewed by, and does not otherwise reflect the views or input of, the Research Department of Santander (“Santander Research”). This commentary may conflict with the views of Santander Research, is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to research reports prepared for retail investors and is not independent from the interests of Santander. Santander may have positions (long or short) in, effect transactions in or make markets in the subject securities (or related derivatives) mentioned in this commentary, and such positions or trading may be inconsistent with this commentary. However, Santander is under no obligation to make a market in or otherwise provide liquidity in any security discussed herein. This material may have been previously communicated to Santander’s trading desk. Santander may have in the past or may in the future provide investment banking services (including underwriting activity and loans) or other services for the companies mentioned in this commentary.
This commentary has been provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or related instrument. This communication is intended to be short term and brief in nature, and therefore does not provide a full analysis of any issuer or security or a sufficient basis upon which to base an investment decision. The individual circumstances of the recipient’s investment objectives and needs have not been considered in this commentary, and nothing in this commentary constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or a representation that any investment strategy or service is suitable or appropriate to the recipient’s individual circumstances. Information contained herein has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness. The recipient should not rely on this commentary for any investment decision or other action, and Santander expressly disclaims any liability for any losses arising from any reliance on or otherwise related to this commentary. This commentary reflects the personal views of the individual sender of such commentary, and no part of his or her individual compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to its content. This commentary is provided as of the date and time thereof, and Santander does not undertake any responsibility to update or revise any of the information contained herein, which may change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Fixed income securities, including those described herein, are subject to many risks, including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, the credit risk of the issuer, inflation risk, liquidity risk and risk of a downgrade by rating agencies. Emerging markets investments are additionally subject to political, economic, legal, regulatory, market, settlement, execution, currency and other risks. Fixed income, and specifically emerging markets, investments are not suitable for all investors.
Santander Investment Securities Inc. is an SEC registered broker-dealer, FINRA member and SIPC member. Santander Investment Securities Inc. is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Santander Holdings USA Inc., which is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A