By the Numbers

A review of CLO managers in 2022

Caroline Chen | January 6, 2023

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

CLO managers who positioned portfolios conservatively outperformed the broad leveraged loan market through most of last year while managers that took a riskier profile broadly underperformed. And December was no exception. Conservative or low beta managers posted an average of 13 bp of excess return over the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan Index in December while high beta managers underperformed the index by an average of 20 bp. The average manager underperformed last month.

The average performance of CLO managers was lackluster through 2022

The leveraged loan index posted a return of 0.50% for the reporting period ending in December, after accounting for managers’ reporting dates. The average loan portfolio for managers with five or more actively tracked deals had a beta to the index slightly above 1.02. With that beta, the average portfolio should have posted a gain of 0.52%, but instead, managers on a weighted average basis delivered a gain of 0.43%, leaving the portfolio behind the index by 9 bp after adjusting for risk (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1. Managers’ average portfolio performance lost to the index in six consecutive periods

Note: Each reporting period includes the most recent three months. For example, reporting period ending in Dec-22 includes the average manager performance in the past three months ending on or before December 20, 2022. The data shows the average excess return relative to the Morningstar/LSTA Total Return Index for 84 managers with five or more active deals.
Source: Intex, Markit, Amherst Pierpont Securities

The excess return posted by individual managers ranged from 67 bp at the high end to -124 bp at the low end for the December reporting period.

Based on average excess returns, managers’ loan portfolio performance trailed the broad market in nine out of 12 reporting periods last year, after adjusting for CLO reporting dates (Exhibit 1). The average 9 bp loss to index in the most recent reporting period was the highest of the year.

A trend of increasing performance variability

Managers’ excess returns have shown greater dispersion lately. For example, the difference between the 75th percentile and the 25th percentile of excess return averaged 23 bp in the first six reporting periods of 2022 but more than doubled to 49 bp in the last six reporting periods (Exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2. Managers’ excess returns have shown a trend of rising variability

Managers’ risk positionings set their performance apart

Managers’ risk positioning may be an explanation for the increasing level of performance dispersion. Managers’ risk positioning, measured by the beta in the APS manager model, ranged from 1.22 at the high end to 0.88 at the low end. The group of risk-averse managers, those having a beta lower than 1, posted a gain to the index in nine of 12 reporting periods last year (Exhibit 3). High beta managers, those having a beta greater than or equal to 1, only posted a gain to the index in three out of the same 12 reporting periods. In general, low beta managers led their high beta peers in 10 reporting periods.

The performance difference between low-beta and high-beta managers has also grown larger. Weighted by managers’ CLO AUM, the excess returns of the low beta managers led their high beta peers by more than 30 bp in the last four reporting periods in 2022. By contrast, the gap was only 8 bp at the beginning of the year.

Exhibit 3. Low beta managers were better performed in most of the periods

Note: Each reporting period includes the most recent three months. For example, reporting period ending in Dec-22 includes the average manager performance in the past three months ending on or before December 20, 2022. The high beta group includes 56 managers whose beta is over or equal to 1 with a median of 1.05. The low beta group includes 28 managers whose beta is no more than 1 with a median of 0.98.
Source: Intex, Markit, Amherst Pierpont Securities.

Loan prices were the largest contributing factor to the excess returns

Loan prices had shown a relatively strong correlation with managers’ excess returns in most reporting periods of 2022 (Exhibit 4). Higher loan prices typically signal lower credit risk, and low beta managers generally have higher loan prices in their CLO loan portfolios.

Exhibit 4. Loan prices remain the most correlated to managers’ excess return

Note: Data shows the correlation of each measure, calculated across each manager’s outstanding deals, with excess return or alpha as measured for 84 managers through December.
Source: Intex, Markit, Amherst Pierpont Securities.

A few winners in a bear market

The median information ratio of CLO deals tracked by the APS manager model implies most managers have some consistency in long-run performance, but only six out of 84 active managers APS tracked delivered positive excess returns in every quarter of 2022. Except for CSAM, all remaining managers are low beta managers (Exhibit 5).

Exhibit 5. Six managers’ loan portfolios outperformed the index every quarter

Source: Intex, Markit, Amherst Pierpont Securities

For the three months ending in December, Elmwood, AIG, CVC Credit Partners, and PineBridge led all managers with the highest excess return. A list of all managers and their level of excess return is below (Exhibit 6). A complete list of managers and their returns is here.

Exhibit 6. CLO manager performance for the three months ending November

Note: Performance for managers with five or more deals issued since January 1, 2011, and tracked by APS. Performance attribution starts with calculated total return on the leveraged loan portfolio held in each CLO for the 3-month reporting period ending on the indicated date. CLOs, even with a single manager platform, may vary in reporting period. The analysis matches performance in each period to performance over the identical period in the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index. Where a deal has at least 18 months of performance history since pricing and no apparent errors in cash flow data, the analysis calculates a deal beta. The deal beta is multiplied by the index return to predict deal return attributable to broad market performance. Where no beta can be calculated, the analysis uses the average beta across manager deals weighted by the average deal principal balance over time. Any difference between performance attributable to beta and actual performance is attributed to manager alpha.
Source: Intex, Markit, Amherst Pierpont Securities.

A link to Amherst Pierpont’s latest CLO manager bubble chart (Exhibit 6) and to data on more than 140 managers and more than 1,000 active deals is here.

Exhibit 6. Amherst Pierpont CLO manager bubble chart

Source: Intex, Markit, Amherst Pierpont Securities

Caroline Chen
caroline.chen@santander.us
1 (646) 776-7809

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.