The Big Idea
Ecuador | Puzzling out the political strategy
Siobhan Morden | September 16, 2022
This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.
There is no quick fix for economic reform in Ecuador, but the next few months will be critical. Ecuador’s Lasso administration just released the questions for a constitutional referendum next year. The focus falls on democracy, the environment and security issues. The referendum may provide some marginal near-term political leverage for Lasso if it strengthens approval ratings and weakens opposition. If the polls show voter support for the referendum, the Lasso administration can improve governability and pave the way for economic reform.
This kick starts a process leading to a popular vote next year. The process includes submission of specific questions to the constitutional court for review within 20 days (cannot modify structure of the State or restrict rights) and then an executive decree to convoke the CNE to launch the referendum (maximum of 60 days after convocation). This took five months under the Moreno administration in 2018 from inception to referendum. Lasso is aiming for a referendum in February 2023, allowing for potential revisions and possible inclusion of “popular consult” questions before determining the final questions.
The Lasso administration has been openly discussing a referendum proposal over the past year; however, the context and political strategy is now quite different. It was originally intended to leverage strong presidential approval ratings into popular support for economic reforms, such as investment and labor reforms. Referendums are a common strategy for the executive branch to bypass an uncooperative and fractured legislature. The referendums are often viewed as a vote of confidence for the executive branch that could either strengthen or undermine their political mandate and their economic agenda.
This is now a higher risk strategy with approval ratings of the Lasso administration below 20%. Referendums typically succeed only when approval ratings are above 50%. Perhaps the intentions are to boost the approval ratings of the Lasso administration based on the popularity of the questions, or further weaken the already low approval ratings of the opposition-controlled Assembly. This referendum now seems more like a vote of no confidence against the legislature. There is probably not much downside risk considering the already low approval ratings of the Lasso administration and the current paralysis with the legislature.
Source: https://www.primicias.ec/noticias/politica/lasso-preguntas-referendo-consulta-popular/
The specific questions become highly relevant to whether the referendum succeeds or fails. The “security” and “environmental” questions should be well received, with recent polls constantly citing security issues as top voter concerns and environment issues the main concerns among the indigenous community. It seems somewhat controversial to broaden the scope of the Armed Forces to reinforce national security; however, polls provide the highest approval ratings to the Armed Forces relative to all other institutions. The popularity of these security and environmental questions may perversely serve as a boost to the Lasso administration with a de facto vote of confidence while the democratic questions seek to capitalize on the low approval ratings of the legislature.
The “democratic” questions are a clear challenge to the Assembly and the CPCSS (Council of Citizen Participation and Social Control) on reducing the size of the Assembly (from 137 to an estimated 121 deputies), reducing the number of political parties as well as allowing the Assembly to select CPCSS officials via a meritocratic process as opposed to popular elections. This may resolve the political fragmentation and policy paralysis with better overall accountability and legislative cooperation. The proposal to strengthen the meritocracy of the CPCCS would allow for stronger checks/balances and less political interference amongst regulators.
Success of the referendum will require an extensive socialization process across all relevant sectors, similar to the consultations in Costa Rica ahead of their IMF program. The referendum documents include plenty of details and supportive arguments. The opinion polls will monitor the voting tendencies ahead of the referendum similar to any election cycle. The referendum now becomes the policy priority and the political strategy, determining whether the Lasso administration can improve either near-term or medium-term governability and ultimately tackle the economic reform agenda necessary for debt sustainability.
Siobhan Morden
Santander Investment Securities
1 (212) 692-2539
siobhan.morden@santander.us
U.S. Fixed Income Trading Commentary Disclaimer
This commentary has been prepared by the U.S. fixed income trading desk of Santander Investment Securities Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Santander”) for its institutional investor clients only, and may under no circumstances be redistributed beyond the recipient in whole or in part. The recipient is an “institutional account” as defined in FINRA Rule 4512(c) that (i) is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies and (ii) will exercise independent judgment in evaluating any potential investments and any recommendations of any broker-dealers. For the avoidance of doubt, this commentary is not suitable for or intended for retail investors.
This commentary has not been produced or reviewed by, and does not otherwise reflect the views or input of, the Research Department of Santander (“Santander Research”). This commentary may conflict with the views of Santander Research, is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to research reports prepared for retail investors and is not independent from the interests of Santander. Santander may have positions (long or short) in, effect transactions in or make markets in the subject securities (or related derivatives) mentioned in this commentary, and such positions or trading may be inconsistent with this commentary. However, Santander is under no obligation to make a market in or otherwise provide liquidity in any security discussed herein. This material may have been previously communicated to Santander’s trading desk. Santander may have in the past or may in the future provide investment banking services (including underwriting activity and loans) or other services for the companies mentioned in this commentary.
This commentary has been provided for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or related instrument. This communication is intended to be short term and brief in nature, and therefore does not provide a full analysis of any issuer or security or a sufficient basis upon which to base an investment decision. The individual circumstances of the recipient’s investment objectives and needs have not been considered in this commentary, and nothing in this commentary constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or a representation that any investment strategy or service is suitable or appropriate to the recipient’s individual circumstances. Information contained herein has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy or completeness. The recipient should not rely on this commentary for any investment decision or other action, and Santander expressly disclaims any liability for any losses arising from any reliance on or otherwise related to this commentary. This commentary reflects the personal views of the individual sender of such commentary, and no part of his or her individual compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to its content. This commentary is provided as of the date and time thereof, and Santander does not undertake any responsibility to update or revise any of the information contained herein, which may change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Fixed income securities, including those described herein, are subject to many risks, including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, the credit risk of the issuer, inflation risk, liquidity risk and risk of a downgrade by rating agencies. Emerging markets investments are additionally subject to political, economic, legal, regulatory, market, settlement, execution, currency and other risks. Fixed income, and specifically emerging markets, investments are not suitable for all investors.
Santander Investment Securities Inc. is an SEC registered broker-dealer, FINRA member and SIPC member. Santander Investment Securities Inc. is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Santander Holdings USA Inc., which is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A