The Big Idea

El Salvador | Liquidity watch

Siobhan Morden | December 3, 2021

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.

El Salvador is showing signs of turning into a pain trade, requiring the country to muddle through and source liquidity to avoid near-term default. The debt needs an anchor after its recent underperformance. El Salvador’s bonds now price well below 70 across the curve and 60 on the longer tenors. The question now turns to how the country muddles through without the International Monetary Fund. Solvency remains a concern over the medium term with on high debt ratios and structurally high public spending. But smaller countries with smaller gross financing needs may be able to muddle through for longer. El Salvador’s ability to source liquidity with BRC-related issuance could be the critical litmus test.

The October fiscal data just released showed the highest fiscal deficit yet this year thanks to financing from local markets and external multilateral funds. Spending remains a problem for a country with deficit financing that accumulates already high debt ratios. This past month there was a shift towards higher capex that perhaps reflects a strategy shift towards a public investment growth model. The success or failure will depend upon the transition from public to private investment-led growth funded from foreign direct investment. This is a high-risk strategy with uncertainty on whether BTC-related investment will commit to a low rated country with weak fundamentals and tense diplomatic US relations. We remain concerned about medium-term debt sustainability. However, the outward-oriented strategy to attract capital may curb more heterodox policies and reinforce near-term willingness and ability to repay debt. There was no forward guidance on a formal IMF program but there was a commitment to maintain normal IMF relations on collaboration and publication of the Article IV review.

There was also no follow-through to nationalize the domestic pension funds. This is logical. The Bukele administration does not have to resort to lenders of last resort if there is still the possibility of sourcing external funds. The markets also probably haven’t grasped the concept that access to external capital also probably reinforces the willingness and the ability to repay Eurobond debt. The access to external credit (even if innovative financial products) emphasizes the importance of respecting financial contracts across products as a pre-requisite for broader external accessibility. The true test depends upon the demand for the BTC-related bond issuance on launch next month. The book size should provide a preview to whether BTC investors could offer a recurrent source of liquidity. This should provide the litmus test on whether sourcing sufficient funds for this year and possibly next year. This would postpone a countdown process on identifying the sources/uses, especially ahead of the bulky $800 million January 2023 amortization.

This may provide some interim liquidity relief; however, there is yet no sustainable path for debt repayment unless there is a positive shock to higher trend growth and/or fiscal consolidation. It remains worrisome that the budget for 2022 could be similar to 2021 and still far from pre-Covid levels in 2019. This runs contrary to the trend of other dollarized countries with the Ecuador 2022 budget not only reverting back to 2019 but exceeding the fiscal performance next year to tackle the higher debt ratios. The alternative sources may finance public spending without contributing to sustainable economic growth. It’ll be important to monitor whether or not the Bukele administration encourages inflows from typically conservative foreign direct investment. There was no obvious vote of confidence from the IMF assessment with warnings on BTC risks amidst an “uncertain” medium term projections of the “evolving policy landscape.” The IMF was also clear about the need for a “well-articulated fiscal consolidation strategy” for cumulative adjustment of 4% of GDP.

The valuation analysis may shift to whether the potential carry compensates against downside price risk. This may dominate over the recovery value assessment if El Salvador can muddle-through beyond the January 2023 amortization payment. The timing of default is the first most important risk factor that remains dependent upon identifying recurrent source of liquidity. The launch of the BTC-related bond issuance in January should set the stage for assessment on near-term liquidity risk. There are no signs yet for a countdown to default with still pockets of liquidity (treasury deposits at the central bank, IMF SDR allocation) and optionality for alternative sources of external funds. The current valuations with bond prices at 60 for the longer tenors (2041 and 2050) now discount a high probability of default with a possible scenario of low recovery value (30-40) but still around three years of coupon payments (20) until the 2025 amortization.

Siobhan Morden
siobhan.morden@santander.us
1 (212) 692-2539

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.