The Long and Short

Interpublic raises full year guidance yet again

Meredith Contente | October 22, 2021

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

The Interpublic Group of Companies’ (IPG) third quarter results exceeded expectations, prompting management to raise full year guidance once again. Organic sales growth of 15% beat street estimates and proved to be 350 bp higher than the company’s closest peer, Omnicom (OMC – Baa1/BBB+), boosted by its higher percentage of revenue from the healthcare sector, which stands at approximately 28% versus 16% at OMC. This has enabled IPG to rebound much quicker from the lows witnessed at the start of the pandemic. The strong growth and solid margins, coupled with continued decreasing leverage are catalysts for potential upgrades of IPG by the rating agencies over the intermediate term. Since OMC has no debt maturities beyond a 10-year, there is continued support for IPG’s bonds in the long end of the curve, particularly the 20-year, given its lower coupon.

For the nine months ended 9/30/21, IPG’s organic growth rate was 12%, with double-digit organic growth in all geographic markets. While IPG’s credit metrics are slightly weaker than those of OMC, as evidenced in Exhibit 1, we note that IPG repaid $500 million of debt after quarter end with cash on hand. That said, IPG’s total lease adjusted leverage is now 2.6x and just slightly lower than that of OMC.

Exhibit 1: IPG vs. OMC Financial Metrics

Source: Company Reports; APS

Margins Continue to Grow

Despite the havoc that the pandemic caused for the ad agencies, IPG has witnessed a very impressive rebound to the top line and was also able to maintain margins. The quarterly EBITDA margin stood at 16.3%, which was a 10 bp increase from the year-ago period and a 160 bp expansion from the third quarter of 2019. Management’s ability to grow in an environment when the top line is declining was a true testament to their focus on cost cutting and its credit profile. IPG noted that they continue to see efficiencies in both structural and variable expense categories. Management executed several structural changes starting in 2Q20, which continued throughout the remainder of 2020. On the variable side, travel expenses, which have increased from last year’s levels, are still below levels witnessed in 2019. That said, IPG was able to deliver further margin growth this quarter despite seeing a 180bps rise in salary expenses (as headcount grew by nearly 4,500) as well as an increase in performance-based compensation. We expect IPG to further prioritize expense management going forward.

Debt Maturity Profile Extended and Very Manageable

As noted earlier, IPG repaid $500 million of debt subsequent to quarter end with cash on hand. We note that IPG’s debt issuance back in February of this year was used to redeem $250 million of 4% notes due in 2022, $500 million of 3.75% notes due in 2023 and to partially pay down the company’s 4.2% notes due 2024. That said, IPG’s next debt maturity is the remaining $250 million balance of the 4.2% 2024 notes. IPG was able to extend its debt maturity profile with the deal while reducing overall interest costs. IPG’s weighted average debt maturity now stands at 12 years, while OMC’s weighted average maturity is roughly half at 6.7 years. Furthermore, IPG’s largest debt maturity year is 2030 when $650 million comes due, while OMC has 3 years where over $1.0 billion matures (2026, 2030 and 2031).

Exhibit 2. IPG Debt Maturity Profile

Source: Company Reports; APS

Financial Strength Important for Value Creation

Management noted on the earnings call that the strength of their balance sheet and liquidity remains important for value creation. While the cash balance was reduced to just under $2.0 billion with the debt payment, liquidity stands at nearly $3.5 billion as the company maintains an untapped $1.5 billion revolver. With no debt now maturing until 2024, IPG remains in a very strong position to execute on tuck-in acquisitions while returning cash to shareholders via the dividend, which stands at roughly $400 million annually. With free cash flow expected to be at least $1.0 billion on an annual basis, IPG could continue to grow via strategic acquisitions without any further increase to debt levels. Again, lease adjusted leverage now stands at 2.6x and we expect leverage to tick down further as EBITDA continues to grow. Core debt (not adjusted for leases), stood at approximately $3.0 billion post the recent debt paydown, while non-adjusted EBITDA was roughly $1.54 billion, translating to “core” leverage of just under 2.0x.

Agencies Revise Outlooks to Stable

Both Moody’s and S&P revised the outlooks on IPG from negative to stable earlier this year, reflecting the faster pace of recovery and return to positive organic growth. We believe IPG’s rebound in organic growth has exceeded the agencies expectations as IPG is close to or at the metrics needed for an upgrade to high-BBB. Moody’s had made mention in their release that they were concerned over potential “economic scarring” from the pandemic which could potentially make advertisers less willing to increase ad budgets going forward. Global advertising spend is expected to rise 11.2% in 2021 (according to Zenith) and currently IPG is exceeding that rate as its organic revenues are up 12% for the first nine months of 2021. That said, we believe the concern over the potential for economic scarring, according to Moody’s, may be overdone.

S&P noted that IPG has demonstrated and remained committed to its conservative financial policy by suspending share repurchases when it acquired Axciom in 2018 and maintaining that policy during the pandemic to improve liquidity. As we expect IPG to return to tuck in acquisitions and shareholder rewards, we think IPG will do so while maintaining core leverage at or below 2.0x. Should that metric move closer to 1.75x, we think S&P will look to upgrade, or at the very least, revise the outlook to positive. However, at the time of the outlook revision (March 2021) S&P was not expecting IPG to be close to its metrics needed for an upgrade for another two years.

Meredith Contente
meredith.contente@santander.us
1 (646) 776-7753

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.