By the Numbers

Housing finance | Notes from Washington

| October 21, 2021

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

The pace of change in housing finance policy has picked up with the new administration in Washington, and we decided to put out a set of quick notes each week on key developments. The highlights this week:

  • The Federal Housing Finance Agency has put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac LLPAs under review and may make some targeted changes
  • A binding cap on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchases of investor and other loans is likely gone although FHFA may use other means to shape GSE market share
  • A reduction in Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance premiums, although likely off the table this year, could happen next year and might be targeted rather than across-the-board
  • The White House has begun reviewing reductions in the housing provisions of the proposed $3.5 trillion spending bill

The Federal Housing Finance Agency has put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac LLPAs under review and may make some targeted changes

Acting FHFA Director Sandra Thompson told an audience of affordable housing advocates last week that the agency was beginning to review Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guarantee pricing. The affordable housing community has asked for a dramatic reduction or even an elimination of risk-based LLPAs, but this is extremely unlikely.

A dramatic reduction in LLPAs would entail difficult tradeoffs, including a possible increase in the monthly running guarantee fees that apply to all loans. This could push pricing on low-risk loans into other channels, including private portfolios or MBS, increasing the overall risk of GSE pools and requiring still higher pricing. There is some concern, as well, that cutting LLPAs could push some home prices even further beyond the reach of some potential homeowners. Thompson, as a career regulator, is unlikely to move so aggressively. She is more likely to decrease modestly the pricing curve for LLPAs and perhaps use the pricing review to create targeted subsidies for first-time homebuyers, targeted locations and other traditionally underserved populations. That may include redirecting the 10 bp fee imposed by the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 to help reduce the US deficit; the fee expired on October 1.

A binding cap on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchases of investor and other loans is likely gone although FHFA may use other means to shape GSE market share

The recent FHFA decision to suspend binding caps on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchases of investor loans, second property loans and loans with layered risks will likely stay in place for the foreseeable future. Some press reports have suggested the caps might get reimposed. FHFA suspended the caps in part because caps looked like an inefficient way to influence GSE market share. FHFA traditionally has used LLPAs and other pricing mechanism to regulate share and may change pricing. It would traditionally set new LLPAs just below the point that would push the loans into the private market. If FHFA does reimpose a cap, it would likely be well above the level that would limit GSE purchases.

FHFA also suspended the $80 billion caps on multifamily purchases applied separately to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and some reports have suggested the lower $70 billion caps included in the annual FHFA scorecard would apply. That seems unlikely. The new scorecard will likely raise the multifamily cap.

A reduction in Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance premiums, although likely off the table this year, could happen next year and might be targeted rather than across-the-board

Despite concern in some corners of the market that the FHA will reduce MIPs this year, the over-10% delinquency rate at FHA will likely push any decision into the first half of next year. Many of those loans are in forbearance, and FHA worries many of those borrowers may be unemployed. FHA will likely wait to see results as loans leave forbearance and reassess impact on projected insurance fund capital. Even if losses after forbearance prove manageable and capital projections prove adequate, FHA may weigh cuts in MIPs to targeted groups rather than the across-the-board cuts seen on occasion since 2008. Those cuts could subsidize first-time homebuyers, targeted locations and other traditionally underserved populations.

The White House has begun reviewing reductions in the housing provisions of the proposed $3.5 trillion spending bill

The administration’s proposed Build Back Better Act includes more than $300 billion in housing programs. They are heavily tilted toward repair and renovation of public housing ($80 billion), especially in New York, with the support of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). They are also tilted toward Section 8 vouchers ($90 billion), with the support of Maxine Waters (D-CA), chair of the House Committee on Financial Services. The administration and supporters in Congress are debating whether to cut programs pro-rata or cut only lower priorities. The administration is heavily focused on building affordable housing, through grants, tax incentives and incentives for localities to eliminate the multiple layers of local review and approval for zoning, building and financing multifamily housing.

SCIB US Strategy Team

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

The Library

Search Articles