The Big Idea

Buenos Aires| Debt restructuring

| March 26, 2021

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.

Investor patience is wearing thin on restructuring $7 billion in Buenos Aires Eurobond debt. The bounce on BUENOS bond prices in recent sessions reflects improved terms from the province administration after a year of nonpayment and steady repetition of a lowball offer. Despite recent flexibility, the negotiations still look difficult. Investors hesitate to forfeit high coupons and instead are filing lawsuits in New York this week. It is hard to believe that Argentina wrapped up its debt restructuring last September while the impasse continues in the Province of Buenos Aires. Still, there is upside.

The main point of contention focuses on whether the Province of Buenos Aires requires solvency relief with large haircuts on coupons. The current low bond prices of 40 reflect a floor on the latest offer and historic recovery value. There is asymmetry to the upside if the final terms translate into higher relative current yield compared to Argentina’s sovereign debt and recognize high past due interest that accumulates through a final debt restructuring.

The latest official statements confirm revised guidance including no haircut on capital (prior 10% haircut), a higher average coupon of 4% and slightly shorter maturity extension of 11 years instead of 13 years.  There was also a shift towards intra-curve equity with no differentiation between the 2006 and 2015 indentures while also payment-in-kind for past due interest on a more simplified 50%-50% allocation of the new BUENOS’31 and BUENOS’39 bonds. The NPV at 11% discount rate translates into average recovery value of 60.1 and a substantial improvement against the initial offer of 45.5.  This is not too far from the earlier expectations that the province, similar to the sovereign, would provide a 37.5% improvement from initial to final offer.

But now it gets more complicated.  The Province of Buenos Aires now faces a more rigid stance from bondholders. The counter-response from the bondholders (GTAM proposal) was for much higher 6% average coupons for average NPV of 76 (11% discount rate).   The debate is whether the province requires solvency relief and a large haircut on coupons.

The lessons learned from Argentina may now contaminate the Buenos bondholder discussions.  The critical flaw of the sovereign debt restructuring was for bondholders to accept the large 60% haircut on coupon payments. The previous exit yields of 11% on the ARGENT’35 last September have since reached highs of 17% due to a weak economic policy framework that undermines future debt repayment capacity.  The weak economic framework and balance-of-payments stress affects all Argentina corporates and quasi-sovereigns with higher convertibility risk. The recent foreign exchange restrictions represent a new worse chapter for Argentina default on forced default for corporates and quasi-sovereigns.

So, bottom line is that bondholders are paid almost nothing over the next few years for the sovereign and may face another debt restructuring once coupons step up and amortizations start to sink. The convertibility risk would also contaminate future payment capacity for the quasi-sovereigns.  For serial defaulters, the coupon payments are maybe the most important payment stream.  This realization may harden bondholder negotiations with the Province of Buenos Aires.  The latest proposal and counterproposal is the difference between average coupons of 4% and 6%, still a significant discount from the high average 8.2% coupons of the defaulted USD bonds. The Province of Buenos Aires, with its low leverage ratios, has not yet shown any debt sustainability analysis that merits a substantial discount on coupon payments.

The legal pressures may encourage political intervention from a sovereign that is already struggling from worse policy credibility.  There is a clear contrast on economic agendas with Argentina Finance Minister Guzman seeking to normalize creditor relations on recent IMF meetings while creditor relations deteriorate in the largest province of Buenos Aires. There have been few if any provinces that have been reluctant to engage bondholders. Most provinces have already completed their restructuring under mostly bond-friendly terms with the Province of Buenos Aires a clear outlier, especially compared to the highest rated and performing credits of City of Buenos Aires and Santa Fe.

The revised terms suggest less relative value opportunities (higher coupon bonds have slight advantage like the 9.95% 2021s, 2028s and 2024s) and more a directional trade based on deal risk, final terms and discount rate. The average bond prices bounced 2 point to 3 points on the upward revised guidance.  However, the two sides are still far apart between latest official guidance of 40.7 and 54.9 counteroffer at 16.5% exit yields.  The current BUENOS prices at 40 reflects the discount rate similar to the sovereign at 16.5% (similar duration ARGENT’38 and ARGENT’46) and have adjusted to the upwardly revised terms. Deal risk is still high based on the intransigent posture from both sides.  However, the current low debt prices of 40 reflect a floor for quasi-sovereign recovery value while high coupons continue to accumulate. The implied exit yields given the deal risk is also quite high at 16.5% for a credit with low leverage and potentially still high current yield, especially if coupons are negotiated higher.  If sovereign yields decline in late 2021 on a negotiated IMF program, then this would also represent leveraged higher returns for the Province of Buenos Aires. There has been often reference of the asymmetrical risk as the primary rational for long positions in the sovereign; however, the Province of Buenos Aires offers stronger arguments on better solvency ratios, higher PDI accumulation and potentially higher coupons on restructured bonds.

Siobhan Morden
siobhan.morden@santander.us
1 (212) 692-2539

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

The Library

Search Articles