The Big Idea

Ecuador | Critical central bank reform

Siobhan Morden | March 5, 2021

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

Ecuador’s legislature has again rejected a central bank reform bill with no clear recourse for the weak Moreno administration. This is an important setback not just for the International Monetary Fund loan in April but for policy after political transition. Resistance to central bank reform shows a political establishment leaning toward domestic over external financing and toward populism and policy heterodoxy. Central bank reform is probably also a red line for the IMF with the current program at risk and dim prospects for renewal after elections. The bearish outlook for central bank reform reaffirms a core underweight on Ecuador with potential for further underperformance, new price lows and higher policy risk after elections.

Central bank reform once again suffered another defeat with the legislative committee rejecting it due to legal inconsistencies. Finance Minister Pozo responded saying that it is not the committee’s role to assess the constitutionality of any legislation but rather the courts. The rejected bill is now in limbo with unclear recourse for the weak Moreno administration, the COMYF legislation already having missed its January deadline. The mid-April $400 million IMF loan disbursement is now at risk, with the exceptional access program particularly sensitive to “institutional and political capacity to deliver adjustment” on what has been increasingly uncertain political commitment to the policy framework.

The suspension of the IMF program would compromise Ecuador’s 2021 funding program; $1.5 billion in IMF loans as well as possibly another $3.1 billion of other multilateral disbursements represent more than half of the country’s gross financing needs this year. The cash flow stress should exert immediate pressure on the next administration. There have already been meetings between candidate Arauz and the IMF; however, headlines suggest no common ground for quickly revising the economic program. Central bank reform should represent a red line on IMF relations. Central bank reform is more important for what it represents—defense of dollarization and commitment to fiscal discipline.

The political resistance to economic reform may reflect the strength of Correismo and the threat of retaliation from the frontrunner candidate. Andres Arauz has been a staunch opponent of the “privatization” of the central bank and continues to insist on central bank financing for social subsidies and public investment. Central bank reform would reduce the political influence over banking regulations, with more technocrat control of the monetary regulatory agency and central bank board.

Why is the central bank reform so important? The proposed reform includes:

Sufficient liquidity coverage of USD deposits (not just private sector banks)
Technocrat appointees to the central bank and the monetary and financial regulatory council, with legislative approval
Prohibition of central bank deficit financing to the treasury.

The political opposition to central bank reform is a worrisome sign of future policy risk with a shift towards domestic financing either from the central bank or forced investment from the banking sector. The budget stress does not allow for a smooth transition, especially if the IMF program is suspended without a second review. The next administration will have to quickly decide on where and how to source funds, and that may immediately expose an underlying heterodox or orthodox policy bias. There could be some immediate relief if political transition coincides with the IMF SDR allocation with potential allotment of $1.3 billion to Ecuador. However, this would only provide temporary relief for what is probably a backlog of arrears and high gross $8 billion to $10 billion annual financing needs.

The markets seem to be recently shifting towards a cautious credit view with Eurobond prices making new lows lately and bonds testing $40 support level for the lowest cash price bonds. Our interpretation is Correista/Kirchnerista policies should translate into similar 15% to 18% Kirchnerista yields that would deeply discount future debt payments. The new price lows for the ECUA’40 should suggest a narrowing of the price differential to the high cash price ECUA’30 as distressed prices may undermine the potential for carry returns.

Siobhan Morden
siobhan.morden@santander.us
1 (212) 692-2539

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.