Uncategorized

Tighter spreads through Treasury supply

| December 11, 2020

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

The list of bullish influences on risks spreads is now almost a mantra. Fiscal stimulus, an accommodative Fed and a likely pandemic rebound all help risk assets. The list should also include record net Treasury supply. A surplus flow in the riskless asset historically has come along with tighter spreads. That has been true for decades, and even as recently as this fall. It is an important reason why spreads between risk assets and the Treasury curve could set records in the year ahead.

It takes two assets to create a spread tango

Any yield spread between two assets reflects influences on both sides, but often the focus falls on the risk asset and not the riskless benchmark. Spread changes routinely get attributed only to shifts in the risk asset. Shifting yields in the risk asset could involve fundamentals of credit, prepayment, volatility or liquidity, for instance, or the technicals of supply and demand. The same dynamics hold for the riskless benchmark, but because it is riskless, supply and demand alone prevail.

The clearest example of the influence of riskless supply and demand is in the interest rate swap market. The swap market is one place where supply and demand for interest rate exposure has few practical limits. Margin and clearing requirements have changed over time, but almost any institutional counterparty can still pay the fixed rate on a swap and supply the market with yield and duration. Supply is not limited by funding needs, which apply in the cash market, including the Treasury market. Because swap supply is practically unlimited, comparing a swap yield to a Treasury yield of the same maturity can highlight the impact of shifting supply and demand in the Treasury market.

When the supply of Treasury debt is unusually high, all else equal, the yield on the riskless asset should rise and the spread between swap and Treasury yields should narrow. And when the supply of Treasury debt is low, the yield on the riskless asset should drop and the spread should widen. In fact, that is the pattern that shows up over long periods (Exhibit 1). The spread between 10-year swaps and Treasury notes reached its widest point, nearly 140 bp, in the late 1990s when the US ran a budget surplus and began to draw down the supply of riskless debt. After the 2008 financial crisis, by contrast, when deficit spending accelerated and flooded the market with riskless debt, the spread between 10-year swaps and notes dropped toward zero. Based on the level of US deficit in 2020 and potentially for years to come, spreads of swaps and all risk assets to the Treasury benchmark look highly likely to tighten.

Exhibit 1: A deepening deficit historically tightens swap and other risk spreads

Source: Bloomberg, Amherst Pierpont Securities

It is already happening

Heavy net supply of Treasury debt is already influencing spreads. Analysts from the Bank for International Settlements looked recently at the spread between US 10-year debt and German 10-year debt, both the riskless benchmarks for their respective markets. Between June and October, the US increased the nominal net supply of debt—after excluding central bank purchases—by between 2% and 5% a month. Germany reduced net supply by between 1% and 12% a month. After accounting for possible differences in the path of Fed and ECB policy rates, US yields rose by nearly 50 bp relative to German yields. Differences in expected economic activity and inflation could explain the differences in yield. But swap spreads highlight supply and demand. German 10-year swap spreads widened from August into December as the supply of the local riskless asset fell while US 10-year swap spread remained roughly unchanged as the supply of Treasury debt rose.

Potential for record tight spreads

Investors looking to historic spreads for guidance should consider that US deficits and the net supply of Treasury debt are setting records and should continue to run at historically high levels, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The market should have already priced some of the forward supply in, but the possibility of pandemic relief and other forms of fiscal spending on housing policy, education and infrastructure in the years ahead could keep deficits rolling. History, in those circumstances, may underestimate how tight risk spreads could go.

* * *

The view in rates

The Treasury yield curve has moved just below its steepest level of the year with 2s10s at 78 bp and 5s30s at 126 bp. The spread between 10-year notes and TIPS suggests the steepening reflects rising expectations for inflation, and that spread has climbed from around 170 bp in October and November toward 190 bp lately. Prospects of fiscal stimulus, pandemic recovery through 2021 and a very easy Fed all should fuel further steepening. Heavy Treasury supply is adding steady pressure, too. Implied interest rate volatility remains low, helped by high levels of market liquidity and a Fed likely to keep rates low and QE running through 2021.

The view in spreads

Very bullish. Beyond the influence of net Treasury supply, fiscal stimulus, pandemic recovery and Fed policy should also keep spreads steadily tighter through 2021. Weaker credits should outperform stronger credits, with high yield topping investment grade debt and both topping safe assets such as agency MBS and Treasury debt.

The view in credit

As Stephen Stanley points out elsewhere in this issue, consumers in aggregate are coming out of 2020 with a $5 trillion gain in net worth. Aggregate savings are up, home values are up and investment portfolios are up. Consumers have not added much debt. Although there is an underlying distribution of haves and have nots, the aggregate consumer balance sheet is strong. Corporate balance sheets have taken on substantial amounts of debt and will need earnings to rebound for either debt-to-EBITDA or EBITDA-to-interest-expense to drop back to better levels. Credit in the next few months could see some volatility as Covid begins forcing shutdown of some economic activity and distribution of vaccines potentially hits some logistical potholes. But distribution and vaccine uptake through next year should put a floor on fundamental risk with businesses and households most affected by pandemic—personal services, restaurants, leisure and entertainment, travel and hotels—bouncing back the most.

admin
jkillian@apsec.com
john.killian@santander.us 1 (646) 776-7714

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

The Library

Search Articles