Uncategorized
Comparing market and rating agency views of loans
admin | June 19, 2020
This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.
The leveraged loan market has taken a view on which industries have good prospects coming out of the current crisis and which do not, and that view broadly aligns with rating agency actions. Returns this year on leveraged loans to consumer-cyclical businesses rank among the lowest, on one hand, and rating agencies have taken the most negative actions there. Returns on loans to technology and utilities companies rank high, on the other hand, and rating agency action there is light. If there is a surprise, it is that loan pricing seems much more bullish than rating actions.
The median industry return in a sector tends to fall as Moody’s negative actions there intensify (Exhibit 1). This trend shows general agreement between the loan market and the rating agencies on the future performance of the sectors. Returns in Financial, Consumer Non-cyclical, and Industrial sectors even suggest a more optimistic view than the rating actions there signal.
Exhibit 1: Downward trend between Moody’s negative actions as % of universe and median YTD TRR of sectors
Source: Moody’s, S&P, Amherst Pierpont Securities. Note: Median YTD TRR is the median of year-to-date total rates of return for industries in each sector, and Moody’s negative actions as % universe is the ratio between Moody’s negative actions in 2020 to date and the number of leveraged loans for each sector. Diversified sector is excluded due to its miscellaneous nature.
Consumer cyclicals have taken the hardest hit from the market and the rating agencies. The value at the end of May of $1 invested on January 1 in different industries in the sector ranges from $0.75 to $0.93 with a median of $0.86. Moody’s has also taken negative actions, overwhelmingly CreditWatch Negative, against 52% of the loans to the sector outstanding at the start of the year.
Energy has also fallen hard. Putting $1 in the sector to start the year has netted $0.80 so far. Moody’s has taken negative action on 49% of loans to energy companies.
Basic materials is the first of several sectors with more moderate levels of rating action. Year-to-date value in basic materials ranges from $0.82 to $0.98 with a median of $0.90. Moody’s has taken action against 31% of loans.
Consumer non-cyclical is next with slightly over 31% of loans placed on CreditWatch Negative or downgraded by Moody’s. Its year-to-date industry returns range between $0.88 and $1.01 with median of $0.96. Consumer demand for food and drugs has remained strong despite stay-at-home orders.
Financials shows year-to-date value of $0.97 to $0.98 with a median of $0.976. Moody’s actions there have affected 30% of loans. Financial firms and insurers have delivered higher returns than the frequency of rating actions indicates.
Industrial presents a wider range of year-to-date returns, between $0.91 and $0.99, and a median of $0.95. Lockdown measures have taken a more serious toll on transporters than manufacturers. Moody’s has acted against 30% of loans in this sector.
Communications displays year-to-date values between $0.94 and $0.98, with median at $0.96. With 26% of loans having received negative rating actions, this sector shows relatively stable returns. Digital services have mostly continued operations through the pandemic.
Technology provides year-to-date returns of between $0.94 and $0.97 with median of $0.96, and Utilities gives a similar year-to-date return of $0.97. Moody’s has taken lighter negative actions in these sectors, respectively on 18% and 15% of loans.
Exhibit 2: Market and rating agency views of leveraged loan sectors
Source: S&P, Amherst Pierpont Securities. Note: Median TRR is the median of total rates of return for industries in each sector between January and May in 2019 and in 2020.
Beyond the general correspondence between returns and rating actions, the overall level of returns implies the market believes many of the CreditWatch Negative rating actions will not ultimately play out as defaults. Year-to-date value above $0.90 and especially above $0.95 suggest reasonable prospects the loans will continue to perform. Sectors with values below $0.85 and especially below $0.80 suggest otherwise, but not many sectors fall into that camp.
This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.
This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.
Important Disclaimers
Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.
The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.
This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.
In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.
Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.
