Uncategorized

Argentina | Final offer?

admin | June 19, 2020

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.

Argentina has presented what looks like a final offer. And although terms improved to a recovery value of around 50, including a maximum of 3.8 points of export-linked warrants, the country has not reached consensus with bondholders. This has deflated hopes for compromise and increased the risks of legal backlash as bondholders “consider all available rights.” Either stress looks likely to ultimately force a compromise or Argentina instead will push forward with minority participation and a slower resolution of the debt crisis.

These high stakes negotiation tactics seem so unnecessary for a country that could just smooth out some residually higher coupons over a longer repayment schedule. Economy Minister Martin Guzman is next week on the schedule for several highly visible panels suggesting that he’s focusing more on a campaign to seek public validation and coerce bondholders to accept the final terms. The markets should continue to disappoint near-term until there is goodwill to reconcile for a compromise solution with June 30 still the next informal deadline. Argentina still stands to lose more with a protracted default and a final offer with only minimal participation and coercive legal tactics to aggregate the CAC thresholds through re-designation strategy. The deal risk is still stubborn with current prices at 38 to 42 against the potential upside of latest offer of 46 plus maybe 2 to 3 points for export-linked warrants at an 11% discount rate.

Exhibit 1: Argentina’s proposal for bondholders

Source: Argentina, Amherst Pierpont Securities

The official statements from Argentina suggest that talks are now broken. Argentina recently released an updated draft offer under the caveat that “investor demands frequently diverge, and cannot be readily reconciled.” The offer did improve from the previous revisions with average recovery value improving from 46.7 to 50.6 including the accrued bond and a maximum valuation of 54.6 including the potential export linked warrant payments (10% discount rate). The fixed payments were improved either by shortening the maturities and the grace period, increasing slightly higher the coupons and offering slightly less capital haircut at only 3% across the Macri bonds. It’s also now a more straightforward menu of bonds and allocation process with substantial improvement to the intermediate and longer maturity bonds versus the second offer.

There were some initial details of the “recovery value instrument” including the criteria for an export-linked warrant. The maximum potential valuation at a 10% discount rate is only 3.8 points for the maximum coupon of 0.75% between the years of 2026 to 2046. The strike criteria seem reasonable to achieve this coupon on referencing the 7% average annual export growth (1911-2019) against the “backstop floor” of minimal 3% annual export growth. However, there is high volatility on the boom/bust cycles that suggest a few years of non-payment and a downward bias to the maximum 3.8 points valuation. For example, from 2012 to 2019 export growth has only exceeded 3% annual growth in 2018 and 2019. This “recovery value instrument” does offer a sweetener to the fixed payment terms. However, it doesn’t exactly allow investors to share in the upside of potential payment capacity with maybe easy strike criteria but a rigid payment cap that restricts investors from benefiting from higher repayment capacity.

The joint counteroffer from the Ad Hoc/Exchange Bondholder group continue to request a portion of upfront cash payment, no haircut on principal, a GDP-linked warrant and other legal terms while the Bondholder Group requests terms on NPV of 50-54 and other legal considerations. The Ad Hoc/Exchange Bondholder group reduced their average coupons and eliminated the PIK feature with lower NPV of 47-58 from their previous average 60 NPV proposal. These aggregate recovery value estimates from bondholders do not seem so far from the latest Argentine official offer but still require goodwill against what appear as tense relations and still unresolved specific legal/payment considerations. The bondholders are sensitive to mark to market on the final terms while Argentina should be less sensitive on medium term repayment scenarios; however face clear ideological and political constraints. President Fernandez makes the final decision and clearly wants to resolve the debt crisis with the markets awaiting forward guidance on whether the negotiation tactics are coercive or friendly.

admin
jkillian@apsec.com
john.killian@santander.us 1 (646) 776-7714

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2024 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.