Uncategorized
Stock prices and inflation
admin | June 7, 2019
This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors. This material does not constitute research.
Fed Chairman Powell surprised most market participants at his May 1 post-FOMC press conference by downplaying early 2019 cooling in core inflation. The move through March well below 2% in year-over-year core PCE was largely “transitory,” he said. One of the factors that Powell cited was portfolio management services. The cost of these services is closely correlated to trailing movement in stock prices. The swoon in stock valuations in late-2018 contributed heavily to slower inflation around the turn of the year and the subsequent rebound has already helped tip core inflation up in recent months, validating the Chairman’s contention. It’s a case study in following the inflation numbers.
Financial services prices
One of numerous key differences between the CPI and PCE deflator is the treatment of financial services. The CPI tends to use an out-of-pocket costs concept, so certain budget items that are paid for indirectly have relatively small weights in the CPI, most notably medical care. The financial services category is another example. Financial services cumulatively account for less than 0.25% weighting in the CPI, because most costs for financial services are paid for through implicit fees rather than out-of-pocket expenditures. In contrast, the PCE deflator accounts for all consumer spending, even if the actual outlays are paid for indirectly, in the case of implicit financial services charges, or by a third party, in the case of medical care covered by private insurance or through Medicare/Medicaid. In the PCE deflator, financial services account for just over 5% of the total. This is one key source of differences between the two major measures of consumer prices.
Portfolio management services
Within the financial services category, one large component in the PCE data is “portfolio management services.” This line item accounts for roughly 1.5% of overall spending and about 1.7% of the core PCE deflator. Measuring the cost of portfolio management services is problematic. What is a unit of output for this category of spending? Is it one months’ worth of taking care of someone’s money? The return that the investment manager earns? Once the BEA has determined the nominal amount of spending in this category, much of it implicit, statisticians have to determine what is real output and what is price inflation. Such determinations can be difficult and potentially subjective.
The BEA’s methodology appears to reflect the incidence of management fees. The structure of those fees makes the price data correlated to the performance of the underlying assets. Consider a hedge fund which charges a management component and a performance component: 2% of assets and 20% of returns, respectively. When the market plummets, performance fees drop and vice versa.
Historical relationship
There is clear linkage between the portfolio management services component of the PCE deflator and the stock market. Examining monthly changes in the PCE deflator component vs the S&P 500 index for one of the most volatile periods for stocks in recent memory, it is evident that the two series move together, both falling substantially in 2008 and rebounding sharply in 2009 (Exhibit 1).
Exhibit 1: S&P 500 vs portfolio management services prices 2008-2009
Source: S&P, BEA
The left and right scales suggest that the proportions during this time period were almost 3-to-1, that is, a 3% move in the S&P 500 index tended to produce about a 1% move in the portfolio management services component of the PCE deflator. The moves were also virtually contemporaneous as there is no discernible lag.
The relationship over the past five years has remained pretty tight (Exhibit 2) but has changed in two important ways. First, the relative scales show that the ratio is now less than 2-to-1. Now a 2% move in the S&P 500 index is associated with a swing of less than 1% in the portfolio management services component of the PCE deflator. Perhaps this reflects cuts in performance fees over the last decade. Second, for many of the swings in the S&P 500 index, the corresponding moves in the price deflator appear to be lagged by a month or so. In particular, the swings in the S&P 500 in 2015 and early 2016, as well as the steep drops late last year, are reflected in the portfolio services deflator with a lag.
Exhibit 2: S&P 500 vs portfolio management services prices 2015-2019
Source: S&P, BEA
Replotting the same S&P data against a one-month lag for the price changes makes the correlation more visually obvious (Exhibit 3).
Exhibit 3: S&P 500 vs portfolio management services prices 2015-2019
Source: S&P 500, BEA
Recent Moves
The recent monthly swings have largely conformed to the rules of thumb laid out above. In October, November, and December, the S&P 500 index slid by 4.0%, 2.2%, and 5.7% respectively, a cumulative total of 11.9%. Incorporating a one-month lag, the portfolio management services component of the PCE deflator sank by 2.8%, 0.1%, and 4.4%, from November through January, for a cumulative drop of 7.3%. This relationship is broadly consistent with the scale of the 2015-2019 graph, indicating a somewhat less than a 2-to-1 relationship.
Subsequently, the S&P 500 index rebounded by 1.6% in January, 5.7% in February, and 1.8% in March, a cumulative 9.1% gain. The portfolio management services index increased by 2.6%, 1.5%, and 4.1% in the February-to-April period, an 8.2% rise. Thus, if anything, the PCE deflator gauge may have increased faster than would normally be warranted (perhaps already capturing some of the additional 3.6% jump in the S&P 500 index in April).
Given the significant 1.7% weighting of this category within the core PCE deflator, the recent volatility in the S&P 500 has had a noticeable impact on the core readings. For example, the 4.4% slide in January subtracted 7½ bp from the January core PCE reading. A flat reading for the portfolio management category, all else equal, would have pushed the January core inflation monthly increase to 0.11% (the actual reading was up 0.03%). Conversely, the 4.1% jump in April added 7 bp to the core PCE, whereas a flat change in the portfolio services component would have limited the core gain (which was 0.25%) to 0.18%.
Conclusion
Chairman Powell’s declaration that the dip in core inflation as measured by the core PCE deflator early this year was transitory was borne out to a degree by the steep monthly advance in April, which almost rounded up to +0.3%. The portfolio management services component contributed to the recent swings, which he alluded to in his press conference. Another key contributor to the soft start to the year, apparel, has yet to reverse and was almost certainly down sharply in March and April in large part due to change in the BLS’s data collection methodology, an entirely different dynamic.
One might reasonably ask whether swings in stock prices should be driving noticeable swings in the critical core inflation figures, since they have little to do with the type of cyclical inflation pressures that monetary policy should be systematically responding to. Although market participants generally accept the inflation data at face value, inflation figures often swing around on a high-frequency basis due to anomalies that should not have implications for the Fed. Understanding why inflation is accelerating or moderating can be important in gauging what the Fed’s response may be.
This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.
This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.
Important Disclaimers
Copyright © 2025 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.
The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.
This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.
In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.
Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.
Important disclaimers for clients in the EU and UK
This publication has been prepared by Trading Desk Strategists within the Sales and Trading functions of Santander US Capital Markets LLC (“SanCap”), the US registered broker-dealer of Santander Corporate & Investment Banking. This communication is distributed in the EEA by Banco Santander S.A., a credit institution registered in Spain and authorised and regulated by the Bank of Spain and the CNMV. Any EEA recipient of this communication that would like to affect any transaction in any security or issuer discussed herein should do so with Banco Santander S.A. or any of its affiliates (together “Santander”). This communication has been distributed in the UK by Banco Santander, S.A.’s London branch, authorised by the Bank of Spain and subject to regulatory oversight on certain matters by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).
The publication is intended for exclusive use for Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by MiFID II and is not intended for use by retail customers or for any persons or entities in any jurisdictions or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
This material is not a product of Santander´s Research Team and does not constitute independent investment research. This is a marketing communication and may contain ¨investment recommendations¨ as defined by the Market Abuse Regulation 596/2014 ("MAR"). This publication has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. The author, date and time of the production of this publication are as indicated herein.
This publication does not constitute investment advice and may not be relied upon to form an investment decision, nor should it be construed as any offer to sell or issue or invitation to purchase, acquire or subscribe for any instruments referred herein. The publication has been prepared in good faith and based on information Santander considers reliable as of the date of publication, but Santander does not guarantee or represent, express or implied, that such information is accurate or complete. All estimates, forecasts and opinions are current as at the date of this publication and are subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise indicated, Santander does not intend to update this publication. The views and commentary in this publication may not be objective or independent of the interests of the Trading and Sales functions of Santander, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to herein and/or may receive compensation from investment banking and non-investment banking services from entities mentioned herein. Santander may trade as principal, make a market or hold positions in instruments (or related derivatives) and/or hold financial interest in entities discussed herein. Santander may provide market commentary or trading strategies to other clients or engage in transactions which may differ from views expressed herein. Santander may have acted upon the contents of this publication prior to you having received it.
This publication is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient and must not be reproduced, redistributed or transmitted, in whole or in part, without Santander’s consent. The recipient agrees to keep confidential at all times information contained herein.
