Uncategorized

Scanning for value in the new RMBS

| January 25, 2019

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

On an option-adjusted basis, newly issued prime subordinate classes offer the best relative value in new RMBS across different types of collateral and different capital structures. At the top of the capital structure, investor-only and non-QM ‘AAA’ classes offer significantly better OAS than prime or expanded prime super-senior pass throughs.

As the new issue market continues to grow, investors have more options to extract relative value across capital structures, credit and convexity profiles. For the better part of a decade, issuance has been moribund and dominated by prime jumbo. But that is all starting to change. Expanded credit, GSE eligible and investor loans are all being securitized in growing amounts, expanding the landscape for relative value.

Looking across prime, expanded prime, different flavors of non-QM, GSE eligible and investor only deals shows there are a couple high level themes. First loans being securitized today look solid from a credit perspective. Expected losses on prime deals look to be little more than a handful of basis points while expected losses on expanded credit deals look to be in the neighborhood of four to five points. From a prepayment perspective, speeds on non-QM should slow to some extent but will likely remain elevated. Fast speeds coupled with potential callability should favor seasoned discount non-QM bonds across the capital structure. Investor-only deals look to have the best convexity of all flavors of collateral while bonds backed by prime, expanded prime and GSE-eligible loans look to have the worst.

Expected pristine credit performance coupled with significant structural leverage make investment grade and non-investment grade prime mezzanine and subordinate classes some of the most attractive investments along with investor only mezzanine bonds on an option adjusted basis. Investor only non- investment grade mezzanine bonds like VERUS 2018-INV1 offer some of the widest nominal spreads in the new issue market with some of the lowest option cost. (Exhibit 1)

Exhibit 1: An option adjusted view of relative value

Source: Yieldbook, IDC, Bloomberg LP, Amherst Pierpont

While non-investment grade bonds appear to offer the best relative value on an option-adjusted basis, not all investors can play in speculative credits. Given this we break down our analysis by rating category to ascertain what bonds offer the best value within a given ratings category. At the top of the capital structure shorter investor-only and non-QM ‘AAA’ bonds show well despite trading to nominally tighter spreads than prime pass-thoughs. Expanded prime pass-throughs trade to some of the tightest nominal and option-adjusted spreads across the ‘AAA’ bonds analyzed. Across prime and expanded prime pass-throughs, higher coupons that trade at wider nominal spreads back of TBA offer better OAS than tighter, lower coupons.

Exhibit 2: OAS and risk across the AAA stack

Source: Yieldbook, IDC, Bloomberg LP, Amherst Pierpont

Moving further down the stack in investment grade mezzanine bonds, prime jumbo and GSE-eligible mezzanine bonds generally offer the widest spreads of any collateral profile, with OAS generally widening further down the stack as nominal spreads widen, option costs remain relatively constant and the probability of the bonds attaching remains low despite the fact that tranches are thin and have little credit enhancement relative to other mezzanine bonds analyzed.

Given the structural differences between prime and non-QM deals, non-QM ‘AA’ and ‘A’ mezzanine bonds trade to tighter nominal spreads than their prime counterparts. Non-QM ‘AAA’ through ‘A’ bonds pay pro-rata, making them shorter than prime mezzanine bonds, which divert more cash flow to the senior bonds initially. As a result, non-QM ‘AA’ and ‘A’ bonds generally have much shorter average lives and duration than their prime counterparts and trade to tighter spreads as a result. Expanded prime middle mezzanine bonds are generally shorter and trade to tighter nominal spreads as well. However expanded prime collateral tends to have a higher option cost than non-QM and generally trade to tighter a tighter OAS given comparable nominal spreads to non-QM bonds. (Exhibit 3)

Exhibit 3: OAS and risk across the AA and single A stack

Source: Yieldbook, IDC, Bloomberg LP, Amherst Pierpont

Looking across ‘BBB’ investments, investor- only ‘BBBs’ offer some of the widest nominal spreads and lowest option cost of all collateral profiles.  In expanded primed deals, the B3 ‘BBB+’ classes appear to offer the best relative value within that capital structure. Locked out ‘BBB’ classes of non-QM deals have some of the tightest OAS, but investors may find value both ‘BBB’ and non-investment grade mezzanine and subordinate bonds in these structures for other reasons. Since non-QM deals employ a hybrid pro-rata senior, sequential subordinate structure, non-QM mezzanine and subordinate bonds can be a good source of total return. Elevated prepayments will cause the senior pro-rata part of the capital structure to de-lever quickly, driving potential rating upgrades and subsequent spread tightening. The potential offset to that would be call risk as many ‘BBB’-rated non-QM bonds trade at a premium to par. (Exhibit 4)

Exhibit 4: OAS and risk across the BBB stack

Source: Yieldbook, IDC, Bloomberg LP, Amherst Pierpont

Certain non-investment grade credits offer the widest OAS available in the new issue market. However speculative credits also have the widest range of option-adjusted spreads of any part of the capital structure. Using OAS as a relative value metric at the bottom of the capital structure can often be a tricky exercise. Given how thin and structurally levered deep subordinates can be, small changes in model projected losses can often yield large changes in a bond’s OAS. Additionally, any model will diffuse hundreds of interest rate and home price paths and some of those paths are likely extremely remote but may have an outsized impact on a bond’s OAS. If investors choose to discount extreme scenarios, OAS may not be the optimal metric to ascertain relative value. With that caveat, ‘BB’ and ‘B’ rated investor-only, prime jumbo and GSE eligible bonds offer some of the widest OAS. While non-rated first loss bonds generally trade to the tightest OAS. (Exhibit 5)

Exhibit 5: OAS and risk across the non-investment grade stack

Source: Yieldbook, IDC, Bloomberg LP, Amherst Pierpont

admin
john.killian@santander.us
1 (646) 776-7714

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.

The Library

Search Articles