FHA signals steady MIPs as loan credit quality slides
admin | November 16, 2018
This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.
The Federal Housing Administration on November 16 released its annual report to Congress on the health of the single-family insurance fund and signaled no plans to change lending programs in ways that might affect the value of Ginnie Mae MBS and CMOs. Past reports have signaled changes in mortgage insurance premiums that significantly affected prepayments. FHA looks likely to hold premiums steady as credit quality in single-family and HECM programs continues to weaken.
The insurance fund strengthened in FY 2018, as the capital ratio increased to 2.76% from 2.18% in 2017. This is above the statutory 2.0% minimum. All of the improvement came from the forward mortgage portfolio, while the HECM portfolio weakened further in 2018.
The FHA looks unlikely to lower annual mortgage insurance premiums
Investors’ primary concern is whether the FHA is planning to reduce annual mortgage insurance premiums or MIPs, which could cause a significant increase in MBS prepayment speeds. The report contains no indication that the FHA is considering lowering MIPs. On the contrary, the FHA reiterates in a footnote that the early 2017 MIP reduction, which the Trump administration rescinded before it became effective, would have harmed the insurance fund. The FHA also notes that the fund would go negative in some historical stress scenarios at current MIP levels, so it would not make sense to lower them. Maintaining MIPs at current levels is consistent with the 2017 annual report and comments made by Secretary Carson earlier this year.
Credit quality is worsening
The report notes two trends that indicate the credit quality of new FHA loans continues to deteriorate. The first is that the average FICO score dropped to 670 in 2018, the lowest level since 2008. The second point is that the average DTI of purchase loans reached 43%, and that nearly 25% of new loans have DTI greater than 50%. Both of these points suggest that 2018 vintage FHA loans might default a bit faster than prior vintages. If so, the resulting faster prepayment speeds could benefit investors in discount Ginnie Mae MBS.
Government-provided down payment assistance loans default more often
The FHA also calls attention to loans with down payment assistance (DPA), which made up over 37% of purchase loans in 2018. This is a sensitive issue for the FHA, since in the past loans with seller-provided DPA defaulted at much higher rates than other FHA loans. Seller-provided DPA is no longer permitted, but borrowers can still borrow money from family members or access various government lending programs (the state housing finance authorities, or HFAs). The FHA notes that loans with DPA default faster than loans without DPA, and that loans with government-provided DPA perform worse than other DPA sources. It is possible the FHA will try to influence the state HFAs to modify their programs to improve credit quality.
The HECM portfolio weakened again
The HECM portion of the insurance fund weakened further—the capital ratio declined to -18.83%. However, the FHA does not indicate that further changes to principal limit factors (PLFs) are forthcoming. Instead, they point to two recent changes that weren’t fully accounted for in the 2018 results:
- The October 2017 PLF reduction only applied to 52% of loans originated over the last year. September 2018 was the first month in which 100% of HECMs were originated under the October 2017 PLFs.
- At the end of September the FHA announced new appraisal requirements. When the FHA suspects an appraisal was inflated they can required the lender to get a second appraisal.
Investors in HECM pools are most concerned that the FHA would increase PLFs, which would boost prepayment speeds. However, this seems extremely unlikely while the FHA is monitoring whether the recent PLF reduction sufficiently improved credit quality. It seems more likely that the FHA could decide to lower PLFs again if HECM performance does not improve sufficiently.
This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.
This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.
Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.
In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.
The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.
This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.
In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.
Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.