Uncategorized

Low leverage and plenty of cash at Darden

admin | June 21, 2019

This document is intended for institutional investors and is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to debt research reports prepared for retail investors.

Darden Restaurants (DRI) had a decent quarter despite a miss in same store sales growth. Even with a potential acquisition on the horizon, DRI’s leverage is likely to remain at least a turn better than that of McDonald’s (MCD). The DRI 4.55% 2/15/48 bonds currently look attractive relative to MCD 4.45% 3/1/47 as they are trading 50 bp wide, compared to trading 15 bp wide at issuance.

A decent quarter despite miss in same store sales growth

Despite missing street estimates for same store sales (SSS) growth when it reported fiscal 4Q19 results, DRI hit its twice updated full year SSS guidance of 2.5%, which was in line with management’s annual SSS target of 1%-3% growth. Overall EBIT margin grew 10 bp year-over-year to 11%, also in line with DRI’s annual target range of 10 to 30 bp. For the quarter, the company posted SSS of 1.6%, which was below estimates of 2.4% as DRI’s largest banner, Olive Garden, came in below expectations. Olive Garden posted 2.4% SSS growth in the quarter which was below street consensus of 3.5%. Despite the miss, this quarter marks Olive Garden’s 19^th consecutive quarter of SSS growth and the banner outperformed the industry benchmark by 270 bp. For the year, SSS at Olive Garden were a solid 3.9%. Management chalked up the somewhat weaker results at Olive Garden to a little industry softness coupled with fewer incentives at the chain. Traffic was down 0.4%, while pricing was up 1.8%. Adjusting for the reduced incentives, DRI noted that traffic would have been positive in the quarter. That said, management is prepared to step up its level of incentives at Olive Garden should a weaker traffic trend persist. Operating profit margin at Olive Garden was flat year-over-year at 21.2%.

Longhorn Steakhouse, DRI’s second largest banner, posted SSS growth of 3.3% for the quarter, marking its 25^th consecutive quarter of growth. Longhorn outperformed the industry benchmark by 360 bp in 4Q19. For the full year, Longhorn also saw SSS growth of 3.3%. Traffic was up 0.3%, while pricing was up 1.8%. Longhorn saw a slight decline in its operating profit margin of 5 bp to 18.95%. Management noted that Longhorn continues to benefit from multiple year investments which have simplified operations and promotional constructs. These investments have greatly improved customer retention.

Cheddar’s starting to turn a corner?

Cheddar’s posted yet another decline in SSS for the quarter, which was down 3.2%. For the year, SSS were down 3.4%. DRI noted that the majority of the decline was due to the former franchise restaurants which were down 6.1% in the quarter. Management was encouraged with traffic trends as they improved sequentially and were 180 bp better from 1H19 to 2H19. The improving traffic trend should eventually lead to SSS growth, according to management. Importantly, Cheddar’s delivered double-digit profit growth in the quarter as they continue to focus on more efficient food and labor costs. Moving forward, DRI believes there is opportunity to highlight the value proposition that Cheddar’s provides relative to their other banners, which could help improve sales growth.

Balance sheet remains strong

DRI management remains committed to keeping lease adjusted leverage in the 2.0x-2.5x range, which is currently estimated at 2.2x. Leverage, not adjusted for leases, remains under a turn at 0.78x. DRI ended the year with a much stronger than average cash balance of $457 million, putting net debt at $470 million. Given the higher than usual cash balance, DRI could be gearing up to make a tuck-in acquisition. Bids were submitted back in May for Del Frisco’s Restaurant Group (DFRG) with DRI being one of three bidders. Speculation emerged that DRI was the highest bidder at $9/share, translating to an EV of $860 million for DFRG. Should DRI pursue the acquisition, management would likely use the majority of its cash on hand plus some debt, in an effort to keep leverage within or close to its target range to preserve ratings. This would be similar to its approach in financing the Cheddar’s acquisition back in 2017.

Initial 2020 guidance

Management provided conservative fiscal 2020 SSS guidance of growth in the 1%-2% range. Notably this was the initial guidance that management provided for fiscal 2019 at the same time last year. DRI proceeded to increase guidance to the 2.0%-2.5% range and then ultimately to 2.5%. Capital spending is expected to be in the $450- to $500-million range. Capital spending for fiscal 2019 totaled $452 million, in the middle of management’s guidance range of $425- to $475-million. While capital spending has been increasing on an annual basis, adjusted EBITDA/capex has been declining annually. For fiscal 2019 adjusted EBITDA/capex was 2.6x, down a tick from 2.7x in the prior year.

Relative value

While DRI has no IG casual dining peers, the credit (Baa2/BBB/BBB) can be compared relative to McDonald’s Corp. (MCD – Baa1/BBB+/BBB). McDonald’s has been increasing leverage to return cash to shareholders, making lease adjusted leverage currently 3.8x, which is over a turn higher than DRI. Even with a potential acquisition on the horizon, DRI’s leverage is likely to remain at least a turn better than MCD. The DRI 4.55% 2/15/48 bonds look attractive relative to MCD 4.45% 3/1/47 as they are trading 50 bp wide to MCD. At issue the DRI bonds were trading only about 15 bp behind MCD 4.45% 3/1/47 and have traded as close as 5 bp apart. In 5-year CDS, DRI trades roughly 15 bp behind MCD. In 30-year CDS, which is less liquid than 5-year, DRI trades 30 bp behind MCD.

Exhibit 1: Historical g-spreads of DRI 4.55% 2/15/48 and MCD 4.45% 3/1/47

Source: Bloomberg

admin
jkillian@apsec.com
john.killian@santander.us 1 (646) 776-7714

This material is intended only for institutional investors and does not carry all of the independence and disclosure standards of retail debt research reports. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This message, including any attachments or links contained herein, is subject to important disclaimers, conditions, and disclosures regarding Electronic Communications, which you can find at https://portfolio-strategy.apsec.com/sancap-disclaimers-and-disclosures.

Important Disclaimers

Copyright © 2023 Santander US Capital Markets LLC and its affiliates (“SCM”). All rights reserved. SCM is a member of FINRA and SIPC. This material is intended for limited distribution to institutions only and is not publicly available. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited.

In making this material available, SCM (i) is not providing any advice to the recipient, including, without limitation, any advice as to investment, legal, accounting, tax and financial matters, (ii) is not acting as an advisor or fiduciary in respect of the recipient, (iii) is not making any predictions or projections and (iv) intends that any recipient to which SCM has provided this material is an “institutional investor” (as defined under applicable law and regulation, including FINRA Rule 4512 and that this material will not be disseminated, in whole or part, to any third party by the recipient.

The author of this material is an economist, desk strategist or trader. In the preparation of this material, the author may have consulted or otherwise discussed the matters referenced herein with one or more of SCM’s trading desks, any of which may have accumulated or otherwise taken a position, long or short, in any of the financial instruments discussed in or related to this material. Further, SCM or any of its affiliates may act as a market maker or principal dealer and may have proprietary interests that differ or conflict with the recipient hereof, in connection with any financial instrument discussed in or related to this material.

This material (i) has been prepared for information purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities, related investments or other financial instruments, (ii) is neither research, a “research report” as commonly understood under the securities laws and regulations promulgated thereunder nor the product of a research department, (iii) or parts thereof may have been obtained from various sources, the reliability of which has not been verified and cannot be guaranteed by SCM, (iv) should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person, without SCM’s prior consent and (v) is not intended for distribution in any jurisdiction in which its distribution would be prohibited.

In connection with this material, SCM (i) makes no representation or warranties as to the appropriateness or reliance for use in any transaction or as to the permissibility or legality of any financial instrument in any jurisdiction, (ii) believes the information in this material to be reliable, has not independently verified such information and makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy or completeness of such information, (iii) accepts no responsibility or liability as to any reliance placed, or investment decision made, on the basis of such information by the recipient and (iv) does not undertake, and disclaims any duty to undertake, to update or to revise the information contained in this material.

Unless otherwise stated, the views, opinions, forecasts, valuations, or estimates contained in this material are those solely of the author, as of the date of publication of this material, and are subject to change without notice. The recipient of this material should make an independent evaluation of this information and make such other investigations as the recipient considers necessary (including obtaining independent financial advice), before transacting in any financial market or instrument discussed in or related to this material.